Tuliptiptoe
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 12, 2012
- Messages
- 1,118
- Reaction score
- 8,409
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well doesn't discovery rules come into play after he enters a plea? If he didn't enter a plea it still can be in the investigation stage and not discover right?
Doesn't surprise me AGT didn't plea today. I believe the PD needs more time to review the evidence in the case before a plea is made. Remember, in our justice system, the prosecution has to present irrefutable evidence in a murder one case, enough to convince a jury of his guilt. It's especially important that the PD represents AGT well so he can't claim incompetent representation later on should the DA prove the state's case. Murder is never taken lightly.
JMOO
THANK YOU!! I was scrolling down getting ready to post when I read this.
ANY decent defense attorney is going to advise his client not to enter a plea until he has had as much time as possible to review the evidence against his client and build his defense. It's his right to have a fair trial, and the only way it can be fair is if his attorney knows everything he's dealing with.
It would surprise me if this went to trial in a year, probably closer to 2 years.
THANK YOU!! I was scrolling down getting ready to post when I read this.
ANY decent defense attorney is going to advise his client not to enter a plea until he has had as much time as possible to review the evidence against his client and build his defense. It's his right to have a fair trial, and the only way it can be fair is if his attorney knows everything he's dealing with.
It would surprise me if this went to trial in a year, probably closer to 2 years.
I don't have a criminal law background... it is a whole different game. That being said, there are as many motions as there are words in the English language. This could go on forever unless AGT cops to a plea agreement. Hard to know how he will proceed without any background information on him.Ok, so, I'm still trying to understand the court process here. Forgive my stupidity, LOL!
Here are my questions:
1. So, before July 10th, the state will have had to release what they have against him?
2. Today, he could have said he plead guilty or not guilty, correct? Seems like it would be best to say not guilty and bring this to trial, no? Would the defense attorney consider advising him to plea guilty? How often does that happen?
3. Did he not plea today because they wanted to buy more time? And how many times can one do this?
Ok, so, I'm still trying to understand the court process here. Forgive my stupidity, LOL!
Here are my questions:
1. So, before July 10th, the state will have had to release what they have against him?
2. Today, he could have said he plead guilty or not guilty, correct? Seems like it would be best to say not guilty and bring this to trial, no? Would the defense attorney consider advising him to plea guilty? How often does that happen?
3. Did he not plea today because they wanted to buy more time? And how many times can one do this?
I'm probably wrong, but the PD would only have the reason for arrest paperwork...they wouldn't get all the discovery until he makes a plea, no??
Doesn't the accused plead "not guilty"....THEN get the info against him - discovery/results....THEN figure out the course of action on how to defend his client??
What does it mean that he waived a preliminary hearing? And why would you do that?