CA CA - Susan Jacobson, 59, Sun City/Roseville, 2 May 2013 - #2

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
I too have questions about what/who was or was not seen on video. I also have questions about the placement of the car in the parking lot that Kjac22 said on WS that the police won't tell the family the Exact parking spot.
Why not tell the family? Why keep that info away from the family?
I would also like to know who else was the last person to see Susan besides her husband, and what exact time period that occurred.
I would like to know if she kept in contact with previous co-workers, and it was said on WS what her previous job was, but that was not confirmed by family or media to my knowledge, so what was her job title, where did she work and did she communicate with those people previous to her going missing?
There is Little known about Susan.Lots of questions that could be answered if people knew Susan, if people would come forward to help. I understand she wasn't a "social" person, but she had people in her life.
Maybe bits and pieces could pull together a clue?
Going back to the car. I would like to know if the car is still impounded (if it ever was) or was given back to the family, and if given back, when was it given back?
I would like to know if their house was burglarized since Susan and her keys are missing?
Strange how the car was unlocked, but not stolen. If she were kidnapped, that person could have taken the car keys and car, but the car was not taken.
I would like to know if the credit cards that were "supposed" to be in her wallet, but now missing, were used after Susan went missing. After all, why take credit cards, but not use them?
I would like to know if any of her clothing or personal items that Susan liked were missing Prior to the day Susan went missing.

If Susan wanted to disappear herself, she did a very good job! If someone wanted to disappear Susan, I don't think that Susan is in the area, because they searched a few places, and if there were More searches, and no evidence of Susan, like Susan on video or Not on video, or what have you.....sounds like the car was Planted there for a specific reason. BUT maybe she is in the area, but not found yet due to not many searches...
I want to know if LE, friends and family have searched for Susan beyond Roseville?
The family mentioned in MSM that they were going to hire a private detective. What did the detective find?
Susan's case via media was dropped after several months.
Thank you so much for contacting the media!!! It will get Susan's name out there again.
IMOO.
 
Two more questions. Was Susan's wallet that the Good Samaritan found, fingerprinted?
Has LE determined that the wallet could have been thrown from a moving vehicle?
IMOO.
 
Thanks everyone...I am compiling a list and we shall see if any clarification can be had, and what the current status into Susan's missing is. The silence just is not right.
 
Sorry, I have not followed this case as closely as some of you... did we ever get clarification on when the last time someone other than Susan's husband saw her or even spoke to her on the phone? If not, that's another thing I would like to see addressed.
 
anybody remember a piece of property that was connected to...that was north of Roseville? Like in the eastern edges of Tahoe National Forest, in Placer county?? Or maybe out 50 past Placerville /Camino, fringes of ELdorado Forest? lost my old notes:( i can see it in my head but can't find on the map...uhh I think I talked to someone about it....remember a road name?
 
Sorry, I have not followed this case as closely as some of you... did we ever get clarification on when the last time someone other than Susan's husband saw her or even spoke to her on the phone? If not, that's another thing I would like to see addressed.

Nope I don't think so , never got answered here or MSM...but that is one question I bet everyone here wonders still
 
Scott Thomas Anderson, editor, Roseville Press Tribune is who I had reached out to. He has written other articles about her missing.So he is familiar with the case. I hope we will see an update from him, and that he can speak with LE and get their current thoughts regarding this.
 
Hi Sleuthers! :websleuther:

I just jumped on Susan's thread... And found I have missed so much!

Susan's is a very special case for me... I feel the Sleuthers on this thread are her main "voice"....

I am going back to catch up... And hope to find anything in my notes to help with your mission to get Susan's case out in the media....

You all are the best! :loveyou:
 
BBM: I was thinking the same thing. While working on Jennifer Huston's case, with all the searches and the family constantly in front of the media cameras, keeping her name and face in the news, it saddens me that Susan didn't have any of this. No searches, no family in the media, not keeping her name and face in front of anyone who might have seen something that day. Erin Corwin's case as well, all over the news, search warrants, searches all over Joshua Tree National Park, interviewing witnesses and then of course, being on the cover of People magazine.

Susan had none of this. It's such a shame.

I just had an idea from the post above....

Maybe the reporter could approach the article as:

"What Variables Impact the Visibility of Missing Persons Cases"

Using Susan's case as an example in comparison to another case(s)....

Just an idea...
 
Here are "burning" questions of mine:
(though I recognize they overlap those of other posters...)

- Who was the last person that saw Susan....other than her husband... And when/where/why did that meeting take place?

- Did LE ever nasalize the videos of Susan.... And could they share the video(s) with the article?

Thank you ever so much, Sreshowtime, for getting this list together to give to the newspaper folks...

All.... JMO...
 
Sorry, I have not followed this case as closely as some of you... did we ever get clarification on when the last time someone other than Susan's husband saw her or even spoke to her on the phone? If not, that's another thing I would like to see addressed.

I don't feel like we've ever really gotten clarification on anything! This whole thing with Susan's disappearance and the silence makes me :gaah:
 
I just had an idea from the post above....

Maybe the reporter could approach the article as:

"What Variables Impact the Visibility of Missing Persons Cases"

Using Susan's case as an example in comparison to another case(s)....

Just an idea...

Or the INVISIBILITY of a missing persons case... :(
IMOO.
 
Here are "burning" questions of mine:
(though I recognize they overlap those of other posters...)

- Who was the last person that saw Susan....other than her husband... And when/where/why did that meeting take place?

- Did LE ever nasalize the videos of Susan.... And could they share the video(s) with the article?

Thank you ever so much, Sreshowtime, for getting this list together to give to the newspaper folks...

All.... JMO...

Speaking of meetings that may have taken place, etc.
I have wondered if Susan was out of town, or went somewhere, out of the vicinity of Roseville, or even out-of-state for that matter, days before the reporting of her disappearance.
IMOO.
 
What impacts the search for a missing person the most? Family screaming to the media? Community outrage? Police keeping the search on and involving others to help? Sinister things? Curiosity? I don't know, but maybe all of the above.
 
In my mind, there are two reasons that would cause a family to seem to have given up so completely and just move on in silence.

1. They know (or suspect) who is responsible for this (family member) but do not want to further devastate the family by following through with this notion and have chosen to accept the situation and move on.

2. They discovered something- perhaps online or in the home- indicating that Susan left by choice; perhaps to harm herself. They are so hurt and devastated and possibly shamed by this that they have just quietly given up and do not want to devastate her husband further by releasing this information to the media and attracting further attention to it.

I have no idea if either of these could be accurate. They are just the two most plausible reasons in my mind as to why the family seems to have given up and gone so quiet.
 
I just had an idea from the post above....

Maybe the reporter could approach the article as:

"What Variables Impact the Visibility of Missing Persons Cases"

Using Susan's case as an example in comparison to another case(s)....

Just an idea...

Actually sounds like a really good thesis subject for a criminal justice doctorate...or a really savvy investigative reporter....which are getting harder to come by
 
In my mind, there are two reasons that would cause a family to seem to have given up so completely and just move on in silence.

1. They know (or suspect) who is responsible for this (family member) but do not want to further devastate the family by following through with this notion and have chosen to accept the situation and move on.

2. They discovered something- perhaps online or in the home- indicating that Susan left by choice; perhaps to harm herself. They are so hurt and devastated and possibly shamed by this that they have just quietly given up and do not want to devastate her husband further by releasing this information to the media and attracting further attention to it.

I have no idea if either of these could be accurate. They are just the two most plausible reasons in my mind as to why the family seems to have given up and gone so quiet.

There doesn't seem to be a sense of urgency to locate/find out what happened to Susan.
They were married for 35 years, but no public plea to let her go/come home.
IMOO.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
185
Guests online
222
Total visitors
407

Forum statistics

Threads
608,881
Messages
18,247,041
Members
234,479
Latest member
stuntinlikemymamma7
Back
Top