While girls, on average, tend to be more vocal sooner than boys (in my experience, within this culture, etc), I still think it would be unreasonable for baby K to contribute to this case, especially if a professional hasn't spoken to her yet. Her mommy would be the most likely person to get anything out of her, and that isn't terrifically useful/likely in this case. I can't imagine anything could be used in court, in any case, but I also have trouble believing her recollections would be of use to LE in the short term, either.
However, I think the greatest factor in my opinion is that, if TH did do something to Kyron that day, I am thinking she would not have been if she had reason to believe her daughter would be able to tell on her - and she would know better than anyone, as every child develops at a unique rate, to some extent.
MOO.
ETA: My son is just under 2.5yo, and I wouldn't expect him to be able to give an account of something that happened a day before, let alone a month before. Plus, his views/memory/etc are incredibly subjective.
However, I think the greatest factor in my opinion is that, if TH did do something to Kyron that day, I am thinking she would not have been if she had reason to believe her daughter would be able to tell on her - and she would know better than anyone, as every child develops at a unique rate, to some extent.
MOO.
ETA: My son is just under 2.5yo, and I wouldn't expect him to be able to give an account of something that happened a day before, let alone a month before. Plus, his views/memory/etc are incredibly subjective.