Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Notice how he parked away from all the other cars? IMO he didn't want anyone to look inside or the back of his truck.
What am I missing?
The Elder Garland's are Crown Witnesses. They testify that DG was in the shower at 7:00 am. Defence crosses and suggests that DG was in the shower at 7:15. AG agrees that it was 7:15 am.
I might have just answered my own question. The suggestion of 7:15 am that DG is showering, makes it impossible for him to be driving at 7:20 am.
Notice how he parked away from all the other cars? IMO he didn't want anyone to look inside or the back of his truck.
Don't think he's parked there, just stopped. He proceeded from there to park at the mall? We need locals to make sense of these tweets.
Why the hell did he go back to the house? I'm thinking 1 of 2 things - either to clean up further (risky), or for kicks, to see what was going on.
This is weird because, if I'm not mistaken, it said that the green truck went down the Liknes street at 7:43 (or so) and immediately left but it doesn't show up on video again until 8:30 only a few blocks away (McDonalds/Tim Hortons.) Where was the truck for almost 45 minutes?
THe latter.
What am I missing?
The Elder Garland's are Crown Witnesses. They testify that DG was in the shower at 7:00 am. Defence crosses and suggests that DG was in the shower at 7:15. AG agrees that it was 7:15 am.
I might have just answered my own question. The suggestion of 7:15 am that DG is showering, makes it impossible for him to be driving at 7:20 am.
Why the hell did he go back to the house? I'm thinking 1 of 2 things - either to clean up further (risky), or for kicks, to see what was going on.
Lucie Edwardson ‏@MetroLucie now43 seconds ago
Figure didn't appear in camera 6 "I didn't see them continue to walk through," said Bouchard. #Garland #yyc
Michael PlattVerified account ‏@SUNMichaelPlatt 21s21 seconds ago
Just before 5 am, cctv camera captured person walking back towards where truck was assumed parked. About1.5 hours had passed. #Garland #yyc
Kevin MartinVerified account ‏@KMartinCourts 6s6 seconds ago
Lights from vehicle can then be seen coming on and dark pickup truck driving in direction of Liknes home at 4:52 am. #Garland
Bryan LabbyVerified account ‏@CBCBryan 3s3 seconds ago
Bouchard now describes lights shining on a nearby fence, believes the person who was walking got into the pick up truck at 4:52 am #Garland
Valerie Fortney ‏@ValFortney 27s28 seconds ago
A truck is then seen pulling away, same exterior box light on. This is happening just before 5 a.m. June 30/14. #Garland
Lucie Edwardson ‏@MetroLucie 25s26 seconds ago
"Single pickup, dark green colour, no tail lights but box light again" says Bouchard as he continues to play CCTV tape from 38A Ave #Garland
Lucie Edwardson ‏@MetroLucie now33 seconds ago
In reviewing footage from the area, Bouchard said he didn't see the vehicle anywhere within a 1/2 hour #Garland #yyc
Nancy HixtVerified account ‏@NancyHixt now39 seconds ago
Bouchard: Truck seen pulling away from near Liknes home 4:52am June 30/14 #Garland
Kevin MartinVerified account ‏@KMartinCourts now29 seconds ago
After driving towards Liknes home pickup was not seen on any CCTV footage for another half hour, says Bouchard. #Garland
Lucie Edwardson ‏@MetroLucie now43 seconds ago
"We weren't able to find that vehicle using those exit points at all," said Bouchard, they then turned to MacLeod Trail footage.#Garland
Isn't that "leading the witness"? The prosecution should have made an objection IMHO.
Isn't that "leading the witness"? The prosecution should have made an objection IMHO.
I think he went back to the house to see if he the police was there, we do not know where the truck was for 1/2 hour , maybe he was parked in a way where he could see if there was police cars coming. Maybe that when he decided to show up at his appointment, if not he may had gone back to Airdrie right away..
That may have been the time that was given by the Garlands in their original statement so it is no problem to remind them of it and have it put into the trial record. I'm sure the Crown wasn't about to start questioning the elderly Garland parents about their time observations when they knew the video evidence would just override it. Not worth the bother. The jury will disregard any time references the elderly Garlands made that conflict with solid video evidence IMO.
MOO