I'm sure this has been discussed ad nauseam over previous threads, but the body placement is the thing that bothers me the most about this whole case. It's just so bizarre and I keep coming back to it especially after hearing it recounted in that CP24 article quoted above. I think there are a few options:
- body placement was intentional and meant to replicate the statues in the basement (
Barry and Honey Sherman’s bodies were found posed like the sculptures in their basement) - this seems the least likely. JMO it's far-fetched and purely coincidental. But if this is indeed the reason, it indicates a very deep emotional connection to the victims
and home
- convenience - if the victims were ambushed in the basement (i.e. when BS came home through the garage) it might've been easiest to leave them somewhere in the basement, and the handrail provided an opportunity. The problem with this: why the belts? the perpetrator would've had to go upstairs to get at least 1, I assume? I don't think they would be left alone with any opportunity to escape.
- they were intentionally placed in a room that was rarely accessed so that they wouldn't be found right away, if the perpetrator knew their schedule/that there would be visitors who would likely not go into the pool room
- their mussed/untidy (but made) bed is also interesting, could indicate HS was restrained and lying there (perhaps struggling) while the perpetrator waited for BS to come home. That seems to make sense because it would've presented the perp with the opportunity to grab belts. But if so, why not just kill HS right away... why wait?
I guess there is one other option: if it was actually M/S. But it just seems like such an unlikely location to pick for this if both of them almost never went into that room.
All of this MOO. Interested in other opinions.