I'm trying to keep up with this thread; apologies if I missed something obvious, as this confuses me a little.
Will someone "explain like I'm 5" the significance of these stories and possible ties?
Wouldn't most homes in the Shermans' neighborhood (and even the area) have basements? Similarly, wouldn't neighbors include affluent members of similar occupations, like bankers, real estate developers, etc? Birds of a feather, so to speak.
Is there an implication that the controversial business meetings were happening in the same general neighborhoods, or do these posts ask the hypothetical that the Shermans (or Mr. Sherman, specifically) could have been involved in them? Do you think they also could have happened at the Shermans' homes?
I'd like to better consider/study this angle.
Halp. LOL.
(and thank you!)
What I got from that article is since Mr. Sherman likely helped finance the 2nd mortgage for Mr. M (developer of the One Condos) I hope he knew the alleged threats, shady dealings of the former $ backer of Mr. M (who felt threatened and had supposed death threats to him). Just got my ears perked up when I read some of the wild goings on that were mentioned in the article. (even a hanging was eluded to) JMO