Police often say there is no risk to the public . I read it all the time on here
Yeah, right after someone is killed! Lol
Police often say there is no risk to the public . I read it all the time on here
Oh the police statement! Not you! Lol.Me, or him?:thinking:
Terms of the deal were not disclosed, but according to a public filing (PDF) by Strides, the two have agreed to a share swap in which the Indian company will hold majority control. Strides said it will be earning accretive from year one.
In Chiassons examination, it was determined that they were likely not strangled with the belts. Instead, they were strangled with some other type of ligature, and the belts were then put around their necks.
https://www.websleuths.com/forums/s...Toronto-15-Dec-2017-5&p=13903515#post13903515Originally posted by Lexiintoronto
KW also suggests at the 2:02 mark of the clip that the Shermans were holding hands. That seems like new information. He mentions rope as well. TPS only mentioned belts.
Thank you for putting it all together, Tortoise. I had forgotten that detail.
(What kind of rope were you thinking of, KW?)
Your post made me think of the injuries to the Sherman's wrists. I'm wondering if the killer cut the bindings, and there were marks on the wrist area that would indicate that.
Speculation: before death--injuries on their wrists from being bound. After death--injuries to the bodies (could be a bruise) made while using a sharp object used to cut the bindings.
Police often say there is no risk to the public . I read it all the time on here
Yeah, right after someone is killed! Lol
Exactly!
No risk to the public: Capybaras on the loose.
Arguably a risk to the public: Killer(s) at large.
I googled 'post mortem bruising' and a number of articles came up, but they're copyrighted.I don’t think marks can be left after death. That is how it is figured out if things happen before or after death. No bruising after death possible
. Careless handling of a cadaver may produce some post-mortem bruising which may need to be distinguished from antemortem bruising.
Antemortem Injuries - Dictionary definition of Antemortem Injuries | Encyclopedia.com: FREE online dictionary
I googled 'post mortem bruising' and a number of articles came up, but they're copyrighted.
This article mentions it in part:
https://www.encyclopedia.com/science/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/antemortem-injuries
I don’t think marks can be left after death. That is how it is figured out if things happen before or after death. No bruising after death possible
I am wondering if Lexiintoronto was also referring to cut marks in the skin from the knife when the bindings were cut, as opposed to just bruising?
Yes. And it’s just *speculation*: I was thinking about zip ties: put on tightly enough to injure, and it might be easy to leave a different injury in removing them.
[FONT=&]Winter told Galianos on camera that he "embellished" part of the scheme. He also said he fabricated other parts of the story.[/FONT]
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/barry-sherman-cousin-1.4514176
Winter's bizarre allegation of the plot to kill Honey Sherman includes the claim that he lined up a hit man to do the job two decades ago.
"He said, 'I want you to whack my wife,'" Winter claimed. Winter then claimed the plan was aborted at the last minute.
"I called him and said: 'You know, there's no turning back, Barry, if I push the button,'" Winter said.
The Fifth Estate interviewed two of Winter's friends who said they were told of the plot two decades ago, but neither had any direct knowledge of such a plot ever happening.
[...]
Winter and his lawyer agreed to a lie detector test on the question of whether or not Barry Sherman had asked him to arrange the killing of his wife.
The test, filmed by The Fifth Estate, was conducted by former Quebec police officer and veteran polygraph expert John Galianos.
Galianos determined that Winter was not being truthful about the alleged plot and that he "failed" the test.
While not admissible in court because of possible inaccuracies, polygraphs are commonly used by police officers to determine truthfulness.
Winter told Galianos on camera that he "embellished" part of the scheme. He also said he fabricated other parts of the story.
"He was lying, and the test results the polygraphist confirms that," said Michael Arntfield, a criminologist at Western University in London, Ont., who observed the polygraph test.
The cops spent hours and hours investigating the crime. It seems impossible that they would waste money like that.
So the family does not like the verdict. What would that matter?
It does seem very strange that the marks were not noticed by the coroner. Although sometimes people get an idea and cannot see what is right in front of them.
Where does it say that the coroner did not notice the marks?? The report I read, said he had seen the marks.
Remember, it was not TPS who reported this as a M/S, it was a 'reporter' who said they had it from a 'police source'. THAT means nothing. Im talking about while the bodies were still in the home.
As for while TPS waited a month, it seems odd but we have NO idea of why or what else was transpiring during that time.
Without such knowledge, one cannot make a fair assessment.
It will, however, play out eventually. Maybe. lol
Ligature neck compression, from a rope OR manual strangulation??? I would think the manual strangulation would leave finger and thumb bruising on the neck. Very strange.ROPE was reported here:
http://torontosun.com/news/local-ne...death-of-philanthropic-toronto-couple-pending
Published:December 18, 2017
Updated:December 18, 2017 7:12 AM EDT
TORONTO — Toronto Police have revealed that power couple Honey and Barry Sherman were strangled.
The autopsy results, issued by Toronto Police Sunday night, showed Barry, 75 and Honey, 70, died from “ligature neck compression” – either due to a rope or manual strangulation.
[...]