Snoopster
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 6, 2010
- Messages
- 9,611
- Reaction score
- 31,451
Why was the vehicle left running?
Some possibilities:
The dogs lost the scent quickly because there was a vehicle transfer and ben was taken elsewhere. The person(s) were in such a hurry to not be seen left vehicle running.
The vehicle was ditched at this location after Ben has been disposed of. A second car waiting, vehicle left on due to the quick transfer.
I am running on the assumption that is against the logic that Ben is in the skutz falls area hiking. 1) i hike in that area all the time and I am never compelled to park extremely far away, leave my cell phone, and vehicle running.
2.) A psychic made a sketch that resembles most of the entire cowichan area - why assume it is skutz area.
Back to the two suggestions as to why vehicle running.
IF ben was taken between the time he was last seen and vehicle discovered and he had been disposed of between that time, this implicates a few things.
1.) A geographic boundary which encapsulates many remote areas
2.) there was likely not a monetary motive if wallet found
3.) personal - why.
with in the geographic boundary, there are some key areas which would not require one to be seen with a "hostage"
1.) logging roads behind lake cowichan
more risky
1.) mount prevost
2.) youbou/nitnat -
Does ben's wife have access to his social media and email accounts, anything suspicious? Does he owe anyone money- the regular slew of forensic file questions - girlfriend, insurance ets. take his sim and put it in a phone ............
Great brainstorming!
Jumping off your thoughts....
Why was the vehicle running? I would also like to ask "Why was the door left open?"
In the images from Stone Pacific, Ben left his door open when he went to drop off the keys. I'm guessing that the van was still running too. Was he a man in a hurry or was this simply his natural style/habit?
In contrast to the possibility that the van was left running because of a quick 'transfer' to another vehicle, I ask how that jives with the reported 'fact' that the dogs followed his scent to a nearby pond.
I also thought about the fact that perhaps it wasn't Ben who parked the van at the side of the road, but again was confronted by the trail that the dogs followed. If Ben wasn't in the van at that time then how could they have followed his scent to the pond.
The above points are dependent on the report of the dogs following Ben's scent to the pond to be true. If true, and as he wasn't found in the pond, then that implies that it was an intentional misdirection.
If it wan't Ben's scent, then all options are still open.
<sigh>
This case is confusing.