I grabbed these from Google Earth when asking if someone could ID the object on the back of the house. The consensus was that it was a refuse bin. I think someone was referring to the object on the deck which is on the right side of the house (circled).
Unfortunately IDK how to as it is from another poster's shot. If I knew I would.
On this screenshot its not seen but its the correct side patio. View attachment 334369 on post #95. There's a pink object that looks like it could be covering something its next to a white object.
I'm pretty sure that the deck is the large flat light gray U shaped structure all along the bottom and what you have circled is the shadow cast by the deck.
The u shaped gray thing that wraps around the back of the house IS the deck. There's just nothing on it so I assumed the person was talking about one of the two areas that look like piles of trash. The one area I circled on the right has a pink object. Everyone please note that these Google images are from 6/19, before Chelsea went missing.
Yes that makes sense. But in the promotional photo it looked like two decks. Maybe in the realtor's promotional photo it was seperated and looked like two seperate features. Thanks for pointing this out.
fatimhemraj.medium.com
Those images have been AI enhanced (that's why the trees look so weird) so it's hard to say for sure what pixels the bot was seeing and what it decided to do with them.
I know that pixels can make a difference on clarity from a Google arial shot but at the same time if one looks at the U shaped patio its empty on 6/19. I assumed that the area where the rubbish was is part of the patio but now I know its not. So if on 6/19 the U shaped patio looked empty then perhaps an updated photo from the same format of that Google image would show us something on that patio. How often does Google update images? I don't have knowledge on this type of technical range but perhaps someone who does can find out if we can see something on an updated image before and after Chelsea went missing. Preferably from the night she went missing to the next day or/and daily after the day she went missing. Maybe we can see something????? I'm not tech saavy when it comes to some aspects of technology but perhaps someone on our thread who is can work this?
Thanks for this posting. It gives us some more clarity. I found the part about the period of time right after she left the apartment enlightening to this case. So she left at around midnight. Then at 12;57 she called her sister after Paige had been trying to get a hold of her multiple times. So from midnight to 12:57 she was alive. The fact that Chelsea said that she was with a "new Bae" IMO means she was in the presence of someone who Paige may have not known. Snapchat would have either been on at the time or afterwards turned off so the exboyfriend wouldn't trace her. Did she turn Snapchat off or did the unknown person? We only know her phone pinged near the Cenataf (war memorial.) I'm pretty sure Snapchat would be off at that point near the Cenataf. In fact before she left the building (if she ever left at all.) In 57 minutes how far could she travel, not much. It would take her more than 57 minutes to reach the area around the Cenataf. At that time of night I can't see her walking there by herself as its not really such a safe area. Yes, the apartment building she was last at is in a busy area. Around the Cenataf its quiet and nothing where people would want go to. Let's think about the apartment building where she was last at. Nothing on the cameras. She should have been seen leaving, she was seen entering afterall. So IMO she met someone out of view of cameras in that building. She had probably met this person before or maybe not. The person right away picked up on her vulnrabilities and played on them. Four of her fingers and part of her cranium was missing. Well, then why wasn't the rest of her missing. Hit on her head violently, perhaps trying to defend herself her fingers broke. Or something worst?Part one
by Fatim Hemraj
Jun 3 2022
The Bizarre Death of Chelsea Poorman: Part One
Why are people tearing down posters about Chelsea Poorman’s death?
Chelsea and her dad, Mike Kiernan who lived in his van for months while searching for her | Source
''Chelsea loved fashion and makeup. Loved ones say she was soft-spoken, had a big heart for animals, and wrote songs in her spare time. She was very trusting and was always kind to anyone she crossed paths with.
Chelsea’s life changed forever when she was hit by a truck at age 16. The accident resulted in massive injuries including two broken legs, a paralyzed arm, and a brain injury that left Chelsea mentally younger than her age.''
On September 6, 2020, Chelsea went out for dinner with her sister, Paige. After sharing a few drinks at Hotel Belmont on the Granville strip, an entertainment district lined with clubs and bars, they walked a couple of blocks (the 6-minute walk took Chelsea 20 minutes due to her disabilities) to an apartment at 1278 Granville Street to spend the evening with a friend.''
''Around midnight, an intoxicated Chelsea left on her own after the sisters had an argument. Paige tried to stop her but she was unsuccessful.
For close to an hour, Paige continuously called and texted Chelsea to find out where she was going. It wasn’t until 12:57 am that Chelsea finally answered.''
The last photo ever taken of Chelsea (L) (Sept 6/2020) wearing the clothes her remains were found with (R) Paige Keirnan, Chelsea’s sister | Source
Can you post the realtor's photo you're referring to? Thanks!
Sure, I'd have to look back because I think it was towards the halfway point from when this thread started.
Don't quote me on this but Chelsea's father had asked about footage from that aprtment building but he said whoever the person or person's he spoke to were not cooperative. He was very upset. Unfortunately I was busy at the time and couldn't view the video where her father talks about this. I just very briefly viewed it and haven't been able to find it. But I intend to. When I find it I will post it on this thread.
It was post #51 this thread. From the angle the photos are I assumed at the time there were two seperate decks.
