"Logically, the Sit'N'Eat would be the place, but we have the claims of persons there of only the consumption of cokes. There seems to be something rotten here, i.e. the flashpoint of confusion, by timeline and locality, is the Sit'N'Eat - persons there, owners, patrons, visitors, witnesses thereof...Big time mystery."
This from Dxman this thread:
1. M.A.'s witness is VERY detailed too detailed (?). How would most associates of the girls have heard about the murders? From their friends in person by telephone. The claim that he saw the pictures in the paper and then called police (he sounds like is a 50 year old bachelor not 18) is less likely than it first appears especially as the tone of his evidence is very squeaky clean. He talks about it being a bad place before less so "now" at the time of the murders (possible but unlikely). If the Star video from September 1st 2009 is accurate and Sit and Eat was what is now the Downsview old diner type narrow with booths cozy) then it is VERY unlikely nobody would see them leave from the front almost impossible because it looks as though the Beckers was next door? Or at least nearby. At 12:00 on a Friday night in spring? And he noticed the one girl blushed at school when he said hello an interesting detail. I agree with poster D. above there is something almost certainly wrong with the evidence of witnesses/staff at the restaurant. And LE are putting tremendous weight on that testimony it seems. He phoned them could certainly be false info. Claim that restaurant was cleaned up a year ago but yet sold in January not likely. Girls hadn't been there for a year or so matches the one year in which it was cleaned up a likely false detail. Had seen girls hitch hike before there. He is hanging around this bad place a lot remember he hadn't seen them for a year yet it was a year since it was a bad place - makes no sense.
2. Not sure how similar the back of the restaurant would be to now, I have only looked at Google street view it looks lonely even now. Back door is very possible but it needs connivance of the staff and again lying witnesses. Over all those years.
3. The biggest problem is that the crime for the time is so excessive very over the top for 1973 a minor drug debt and how could a drug debt could they possibly have had. Obviously everyone knows that and that is the central problem.
4. Maybe not likely but is it possible they were never at the Sit and Eat that night? (I realize this means disbelieving the witnesses but I at least doubt them so if we go a bit further......) How many witnesses do we have at the restaurant?
5. Organized crime: does getting shot in the neck mean anything? I did a bit of a search nothing definitive. But for example "sticking your neck out' as an expression. There is conflicting testimony as to how the bodies were found the sister thought it could be "ritualistic" not sure what she means I assume meaning having gang "meaning" or content. Very very unusual though for the time though and two girls.......
7. Doubt they hitch-hiked. Doubt it is a trucker.
8. Running away: possible but how could they get way into the middle of the field without getting caught up to? Unless older perp? Multiple people in the field is an interesting idea - someone is "egged on" to shoot them by somebody yes possibly a female. Next part I will put in separate post.
This from Dxman this thread:
1. M.A.'s witness is VERY detailed too detailed (?). How would most associates of the girls have heard about the murders? From their friends in person by telephone. The claim that he saw the pictures in the paper and then called police (he sounds like is a 50 year old bachelor not 18) is less likely than it first appears especially as the tone of his evidence is very squeaky clean. He talks about it being a bad place before less so "now" at the time of the murders (possible but unlikely). If the Star video from September 1st 2009 is accurate and Sit and Eat was what is now the Downsview old diner type narrow with booths cozy) then it is VERY unlikely nobody would see them leave from the front almost impossible because it looks as though the Beckers was next door? Or at least nearby. At 12:00 on a Friday night in spring? And he noticed the one girl blushed at school when he said hello an interesting detail. I agree with poster D. above there is something almost certainly wrong with the evidence of witnesses/staff at the restaurant. And LE are putting tremendous weight on that testimony it seems. He phoned them could certainly be false info. Claim that restaurant was cleaned up a year ago but yet sold in January not likely. Girls hadn't been there for a year or so matches the one year in which it was cleaned up a likely false detail. Had seen girls hitch hike before there. He is hanging around this bad place a lot remember he hadn't seen them for a year yet it was a year since it was a bad place - makes no sense.
2. Not sure how similar the back of the restaurant would be to now, I have only looked at Google street view it looks lonely even now. Back door is very possible but it needs connivance of the staff and again lying witnesses. Over all those years.
3. The biggest problem is that the crime for the time is so excessive very over the top for 1973 a minor drug debt and how could a drug debt could they possibly have had. Obviously everyone knows that and that is the central problem.
4. Maybe not likely but is it possible they were never at the Sit and Eat that night? (I realize this means disbelieving the witnesses but I at least doubt them so if we go a bit further......) How many witnesses do we have at the restaurant?
5. Organized crime: does getting shot in the neck mean anything? I did a bit of a search nothing definitive. But for example "sticking your neck out' as an expression. There is conflicting testimony as to how the bodies were found the sister thought it could be "ritualistic" not sure what she means I assume meaning having gang "meaning" or content. Very very unusual though for the time though and two girls.......
7. Doubt they hitch-hiked. Doubt it is a trucker.
8. Running away: possible but how could they get way into the middle of the field without getting caught up to? Unless older perp? Multiple people in the field is an interesting idea - someone is "egged on" to shoot them by somebody yes possibly a female. Next part I will put in separate post.