Not trying to shut down any of this. But 1. does anyone know of a case where anyone let alone a family member was buried in a FRONT yard? 2. Also why make the dangerous decision to escalate a simple disappearance or suicide (as has been said LE's first theory) into a homicide involving a family car? All they would have to do is get rid of EB and then push a suicide or run away theory. It is much easier to say "she had talked to me about suicide" (or running away) than it is to start planting evidence. Why go there? 3. Did the investigators who told LE she could not have been dead in the car (for long or at all) actually suspect evidence was planted do you think? Or were they thinking more simply i.e. just examining the LE theory? What did THEY think happened do we know? 4. Just want to reissue something I said long ago here and it is not much but just in case......some victims of the Scarborough rapist describe a man who cannot have been Bernardo.blonde yes but over 6 feet tall and with facial hair. Bernardo's Greek buddy was adamant B. could not grow facial hair. This is a two Scarborough rapist's theory. Woodland I assume LE would not have bothered to match Bernardo's DNA with every SR victim is this correct? Do any of the sitings around the campus include a blonde man over 6 feet with facial hair? 5. As for finding the car: whether we all believe him or not RB had of course also seen her car and it is easier to see the car of someone you know well than it is for LE to look for a general make etc. 6. Is there any other plausible expanation for the small amount of pooled blood and the mark going only in not out or does it necessarily mean the evidence was planted? 7. I agree that Dotr's point about the man they are looking for and whose pic they released could relate to EB.
With all due respect Chorley8, you have some misconceptions here imo that have never been said, so will try to help out in order to keep EB's case alive and well and more importantly, on track. First and foremost, shutting ideas down will not happen.
Has there been another case of a stranger or family member buried in a front yard or any other area of a property? Seriously? I don't read all that many cases here, or anywhere else, but yes I have seen many - North America and the UK in particular. Prostitutes called for an evening, tenants renting a room or basement and family members have all ended up buried in front/back/side yards for various reasons. Google the idea.
Imo, your 2 makes no sense what so ever. A dangerous decision to escalate a 'simple disappearance or suicide' into a homicide and involving a family car? That imo, needs a far better explanation as to what you are saying - as nothing posted here even remotely resembles that. 'All they would have to do is' .... What I do see is, the mixing up of various ideas into one idea. Doesn't work, therefore requires no response.
The fact that EB may have talked about or even attempted suicide at any time means what as far as she has been missing 26 years? I agree - why go there?
Investigators did not tell LE anything regarding the impossibility of a body being in EB's car? LE are the investigators - forensic scientists tell LE their opinions on LE theories. You need to get that sorted out in your statement imo - RB is in the process of amending his lawsuit based on LE withholding CFS confirmation from the beginning that LE's idea of a body in EB's car was not plausible. Planted evidence is a theory posed here - do you know what the theory states as far as planted evidence? Surely you are not saying someone said LE planted it? Right?
Who is 'they'? Very unclear.
'Woodland I assume LE would not have bothered to match Bernardo's DNA with every SR victim'? Htf would I know?
If you have a plausible explanation for a small amount of blood in the back of EB's vehicle - pooled or otherwise - and drag marks going into the back of her vehicle but not outwards - please advise. One theory has been given - you want someone to give you another one?
If one wants to discount any theories - no problem - that is not in the quoted post though. Please don't start with with introducing info never stated - introduce your own info and or theory.