AddyFinch
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 20, 2013
- Messages
- 553
- Reaction score
- 1,357
Am I understanding this correctly... "the clients do not allege she facilitated, initiated or benefited from the alleged fraud" If she didn't, who did? When mortgage fraud is committed, is it not for financial gain?"The lawsuits for my client do not allege Dan facilitated, initiated or benefited from the alleged fraud," said Glenn Cohen, a lawyer representing the plaintiff in two of the cases against Dan.
"They plead claims of lawyer's negligence and breach of contract, in that she failed to comply with the terms of the mortgage commitment, in particular regarding title insurance, and failed to advise the client about aspects of the transactions."
Or does this mean she was acting for someone else?? Was she the middle man per se?
If she was a sloppy lawyer might she only receive a slap on the wrist for her mistakes? Why disappear?
Was she privy to larger crimes? Or were her clients angry enough to extract revenge?