If you read my post, I wrote in, or near the burning vehicle.
In the scale of the territory of the killings, 2 klms isn't a long way. It took the RCMP some time to ascertain that (a) the body, which had suffered burning was in some way connected to the burnt out vehicle back a small ways along the road, and then to work out that (b) it wasn't the body of either of the two people reported to be travelling in that vehicle.
And then (c), it had to be assumed that the person who's dead body , burned, must have, at some stage , had some connection to the burning truck and must have got to this destination by some OTHER vehicle, now missing, and obviously, the persons who arrived in the burning vehicle , had taken the vehicle belonging to the burnt dead man , who, according to NSW POL had been shot, also.
Therefore, the persons now in the vehicle that once belonged to the burned dead man were absconders, from the scene of an accident, at the very least, and at the worst, were murderers, and thieves, to boot.
And as it turns out, Kam and Bry pretty much appear to be both murderers and thieves. Otherwise, why then burn the vehicle of Professor Dyck ? .. . if not to try and fool the RCMP into thinking they were dead as well..
