I've seen it in a few places. Even one where AS acknowledged it. I will look for the links.Just an FYI-- I've not seen this reported anywhere else but on WS, and no link provided when requested.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I've seen it in a few places. Even one where AS acknowledged it. I will look for the links.Just an FYI-- I've not seen this reported anywhere else but on WS, and no link provided when requested.
Does anyone else find the verbiage, "... Schmegelsky as saying their plan is to march to Hudson Bay, hijack a boat and travel to Europe or Africa" odd? Brings to mind his having asked a friend to "speak of politics".
If I were trudging through a muskeg bog in the wilderness I doubt I would use the word "march".
In turn, I wonder if the friend he invited to "speak of politics" was in a position to know about their intentions.
La Ronge detour was most probably for sleeping, after a long day of continuous driving, with 2 stops only for gas and snacks.Another weird thing is why would they drive up to La Ronge which leads to nowhere. Again it doesn't make sense, but a lot of their actions don't make sense to me. Burning their truck so close to their murder victim is the biggest what the **** moment there is.
Just an FYI-- I've not seen this reported anywhere else but on WS, and no link provided when requested.
ETA: Info was alleged by AS and reported by National Post.
B.C. teen killers hatched plan to hijack a boat and escape to Africa. It ended in suicide instead
I’ve seen it in a few articles. Just google “Schmegelsky shot in the back of the head”.
I assume AS’s lawyer was present for AS’s debrief:
“In an interview Friday afternoon, Al Schmegelsky’s lawyer, Sarah Leamon, said her client sat down with two RCMP officers before the information was made public. He had the chance to ask questions of the two officers, and heard details about how his son was shot in the back of the head by Kam McLeod in the remote Manitoba wilderness.”
B.C. teen killers hatched plan to hijack a boat and escape to Africa. It ended in suicide instead
I believe the reference is to the RCMP report issued and discussed at presser 9/27/19.My apologies if this has been answered before. I’ve searched and without success.
What is a technical briefing? What type of information was shared with the media?
I assumed that because the RCMP said suicide, for both of them, and not the other label of murder/suicide, that somewhere in those vid clips Bryer unequivocally states he intends to die by either his own or Kam's hand.I've seen it in a few places. Even one where AS acknowledged it. I will look for the links.
I assumed that because the RCMP said suicide, for both of them, and not the other label of murder/suicide, that somewhere in those vid clips Bryer unequivocally states he intends to die by either his own or Kam's hand.
In other words, consensual , in a pseudo legal sense.
But I suppose that will play into Al S's narrative, and it will be Kam bullying Bryer, the ultimate act of bullying, Bryer proving once again he was a bullied little fella, by shooting him in the back of the skull. But there it is. .
Thanks for the insight into the video games, it makes sense their strategies would be based on strategies they'd learning gaming.
It also explains why they didn't have an end game that makes any sense to us. It seems to me video games are carefully scripted to offer increased challenges after the gamer has passed each level. And those scripts can be pretty ridiculous: "hike to Hudson's Bay and hijack a boat", or "go back to the town and kill as many people as you can" sounds like the kind of instructions you get in a video game. So it could well be that BS's alleged wish to act out a video game in reality, might be a motive after all.
I also think it was a sloppy, fast decision to actually go out and do it, but they'd been talking about it/fantasizing for quite some time. Two guys just don't go from being normal, innocent, everyday best friends to a serial killing team overnight. There had to be some element of pre-planning. Getting the gun the day they left shows that they had the intent to do what they were going to do when they left and did it. Maybe the time was just right for them, Kam had his truck and camper, they had their "leaving to find work" story ready for their families, they seemed to know the type of victims they wanted to target - vulnerable, helpless, and alone without witnesses nearby. They could have just gone out and did a mass shooting at a mall or something, but they didn't. They wanted to "hunt" vulnerable people. There's no doubt, in my mind anyways, that they talked about this long before they set off to do it. They didn't just bring those guns, see an easy opportunity to kill some people and shoot them out of the blue.. They knew they were going to do exactly that when they left.
JMO.
Crime prevention begins with analysis, of which there are many different kinds. I myself do not see any "romanticization" in looking at autopsies and such, nor in hearing how innocent people were murdered. But without some details, we are unable to form the important pictures that have led to massive reductions (or increases) in crime rates all over the world. In the US, the 1920's and the 1970's were our two most violent decades, and when one looks at the patterns and even just the typology of crimes that resulted in convictions in those eras, much can be understood.
If you're not noticing that there are kinds of crimes that are being committed by armed young males in Western societies, that's fine. It's okay not to be interested in why. But I'm curious why you follow true crime in general, then? If it's just to be horrified and remember horror, that is then your personal reason.
I've done years of work with criminal and other locked populations. Understanding these populations has led, for example, to better designs of jails and prisons, but also to better training and understanding of the people who have to work with them. To me, this work and understanding is crucial.
It's also important to at least ponder how people like K & B differ from their age peers, their geographical peers, and the rest of us. Sometimes we don't get a lot out of that pondering, but occasionally, something new is known or understood. There are some absolutely challenging dead ends in this kind of work and things we'll never understand or be able to predict. At the same time, without this kind of work, we wouldn't understand suicide or homicide at all.
I also found the comment that they planned to kill more people and not just the 3 that they confessed to. So, why did they stop? That was the question I had all along. I figured that they would just keep killing as they moved across the country but they stopped. Kam's backpack was found in the Gillam area and there was ammunition in there so they didn't run out which is what I suspected. They could have killed others as they ventured across the Prairies but they didn't. Why not? Clearly it's a blessing that they did stop, but why?
I had actually composed a post to flesh out your comments. Many people who purchase new firearms make changes (different triggers comes to mind) and I believe some of those really old SKS's were literally found in crates at one point and sold very cheap and some could have changed hands numerous times with new owners requiring modification or repairs.
I'm old enough to predate Canadian gun laws and remember when those old SKS's were actually sold in some army surplus stores.
The police seem to have some reason to believe that Breyer built it and it it's not really a hard thing to do. I didn't read anything in the police report that indicated they felt Breyer had built it and only that it had multiple serial numbers. I would suggest that if someone like AS, asked police about it, they would have been offered possibilites (stolen, home built, private sale as it is, black market purchase).
It's unlikely further details would be released nor do I feel there is any need for the public to know more but I would personally be interested in knowing more about the firing pin serial number and I would strongly suggest that the RCMP have researched it carefully.
Something that struck me as interesting in the police report was the ammo was manufactured in 1975. It's not uncommon to see reloaders using older casings but I wouldn't expect a store to be selling ammo that old.
I'm not sure I believe that there were no indications of a motive, group affiliation, or promotion of a hate agenda on the videos.
With all due respect to RCMP, to say that there was NO INDICATION of any agenda, and then to say that they won't release videos for fear of copycats is a dichotomy of entities.
If there was nothing to "copy", why withhold videos out of fear of copycats? This is a rhetorical question at this point, and I accept and respect RCMP's decision. I also respect their withholding the videos out of respect to the families of Chynna, Lucas, and Leonard.
MOO
RCMP hinted at some problems with the videos. They don't need to nor should they be asked to say or do more. JMO
A news article I read (sorry can't remember which one) stated they both shaved their heads. The Globe and Mail article stated that when they found KM he still had the beard.
Taken from the RCMP report:
Police checks revealed McLeod and Schmegelsky had limited police interactions [nothing of note] and no criminal records. Based on the known facts at the time, both males were considered missing and possibly further victims. Police Dog Services, Search and Rescue, Tactical Troop and Air Services were utilized in efforts to locate the missing men in the Dease Lake area and further evidence.
Anyone else wondering what 'limited police interactions [nothing of note]' could mean?
Agree with all of this... and it’s possible they mentioned details about the suicide pact on the video, but also possible Kam shot Bryer from behind (in the head, etc), which would obviously tell the story as well.
Does anyone else find the verbiage, "... Schmegelsky as saying their plan is to march to Hudson Bay, hijack a boat and travel to Europe or Africa" odd? Brings to mind his having asked a friend to "speak of politics".
If I were trudging through a muskeg bog in the wilderness I doubt I would use the word "march".
In turn, I wonder if the friend he invited to "speak of politics" was in a position to know about their intentions.
I have no links right now, but I've read in a few places in the last 24 hours that BS was shot in the back of the head. In which case I agree with you wholeheartedly; it'd be near impossible to shoot oneself in the back of the head.
It also makes my unleashed curiosity wonder whether it was timed, or if BS requested that it be done when he wasn't expecting it.
Either way, it was KM who made the ultimate decision and chose the moment to pull the trigger. I'm almost surprised he followed through and killed himself; he could have surrendered at that point and blamed it all on BS, which would be typical of a narcissist.
Maybe they were off to Africa to join Boko Harem? .., or maybe Joseph Swako's Lords Annointed Army in the Congo... their perspectives re women would echo Bry's, for sure. .BS announced their stupid joint decisions in each video, so his dad can't really blame it all on bullying by KM.
BS most probably came up with the "march" to Hudson's Bay, hijack a ship, maybe go join Azov Battalion?
RCMP says there was no remorse, no guilt expressed, not about their victims, nor themselves. Business as usual. That's how psychopaths roll. No tears, because crying would have been a waste of energy as their path was already determined.
No use making up emotions they 'might' have had, when no evidence of any such a thing exists.
Psychopaths cry when it seems of value to do so. No other reason.
From my old pal, Hunter.This is how psychopaths roll...”Faster, faster, faster, until the thrill of speed overcomes the fear of death...”
you know the source of the quote
My apologies if this has been answered before. I’ve searched and without success.
What is a technical briefing? What type of information was shared with the media?
Is the full RCMP report available? Where?
If so, please add to media thread for easy access. I've only seen screenshots as tweeted by Alexis Daish. TIA
Alexis DaishVerified account @LexiDaish
The police report contains a frightening account from a witness who pulled over to take a nap on the Alaska Highway and saw a man - believed to be one of the teen fugitives - coming towards his car holding a long gun and in a ‘hunting stance’.@9NewsAUS @TheTodayShow
![]()
2:48 PM - 27 Sep 2019