While we wait on the decision by the judge, as a side note, but related as to action by the Canadian justice system -
In the ruling released today, Chief Justice Christopher Hinkson said that had Henry received the disclosure he was entitled, the likely result would have been an acquittal during the 1983 trial.
"I find that in 1982 and now, the Crown has a duty to disclose relevant material, whether or not it intends to introduce it into evidence," Hinkson wrote in a 97-page decision.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/ivan-henry-award-wrongful-imprisonment-1.3622588
Failure to disclose is an intentional act by LE and or the Crown imo - it is done to hide innocence so that LE can either close their case or don't have to admit they were wrong - or both.
In Vader's case, the RCMP failed to disclose 5,000 documents as they knew they had the wrong guy - imo. The order of events were - the RCMP found the McCann's burned motorhome and failed to follow up what happened to them until they were reported missing 7 days later - unleashing a backlash from the community and losing precious time and possible evidence.
The RCMP then jumped on Vader as his former gf was contacted by the McCann cellphone on the last day they were known to be alive. The RCMP assured the public it was Vader and only Vader using the McCann phone - yet in the Bosma trial, no such accusation was made against the defendants - the evidence presented was where the phones involved were at various times, when they were used and when they were turned off. It will soon be left up to the jury in that case to decide who logically used the phones involved in that case.
Imo the RCMP cannot tell the public they have been wrong all along in this case, something I think they have known since before 2014. I find the whole Vader affair comparable to the picture in the linked article. Put an image in the mind of the public - LE can then have pretty much what they want regardless of logic or fact.
I also think that the RCMP and Crown thought they would never have to bring a case against Vader to trial - they were instead hoping the judge would throw the case out due to the delay in staying the charges then resurrecting them almost one year later. If the RCMP didn't have their ducks in a row after 4 years - something was wrong - yet they chose to proceed.
The crucial question remains unanswered - how did Vader get control of the McCann's?