somecatchphrase
New Member
- Joined
- May 17, 2013
- Messages
- 40
- Reaction score
- 0
Just watched CBC The National news...said "other remains" (besides TM's remains) have been found on DM's farm property. LE not sure yet if remains are human or animal.
BBM: No. DM's ambition tat is not boxed in.. From the pics I looked at anyway..
wow...not surprised at all. I have a bad feeling.....
Im sorry I feel obligated to keep doing this.
The burner phone has not been established as DM's. It could have belonged to any of the suspects, or it could have belonged to somebody else (supposedly the hypothesized frame artist criminal mastermind)
I really feel it is important to be clear on these issues, as if we keep referring to it as DM's burner phone, other posters will come to believe that this actually has been established as truth, when it has not.
I felt the same way after seeing how many LE officers were involved in searching DM's properties.
wow...not surprised at all. I have a bad feeling.....
Key word... MSM (News reports) that's why I suggest we stick with the LE facts and not the media who had one suspect with red hair (suspect #2 to be exact, not DM) and not a red hoodie.
You're right, I had the word "alleged" in that sentence and edited it out. My badIm sorry I feel obligated to keep doing this.
The burner phone has not been established as DM's. It could have belonged to any of the suspects, or it could have belonged to somebody else (supposedly the hypothesized frame artist criminal mastermind)
I really feel it is important to be clear on these issues, as if we keep referring to it as DM's burner phone, other posters will come to believe that this actually has been established as truth, when it has not.
Im sorry I feel obligated to keep doing this.
The burner phone has not been established as DM's. It could have belonged to any of the suspects, or it could have belonged to somebody else (supposedly the hypothesized frame artist criminal mastermind)
I really feel it is important to be clear on these issues, as if we keep referring to it as DM's burner phone, other posters will come to believe that this actually has been established as truth, when it has not.
Ah, okay. So why don't people check those links before posting inaccuracies ie: commenting that TB left at 9:20, when all news reports say 9:30? Preventable inaccuracies waste time, especially for the members who have to clear the mistakes up.
Suspect #2 and/or suspect#3 and/or LB?
Ah, okay. So why don't people check those links before posting inaccuracies ie: commenting that TB left at 9:20, when all news reports say 9:30? Preventable inaccuracies waste time, especially for the members who have to clear the mistakes up.
At approximately 9:20 pm Mr. Bosma went for a test drive with two young males in this pickup. Mr. Bosma had told his spouse that the males were from the Toronto area. Mr. Bosma has not been seen or heard from since this time.
Back to the incinerator.
The model DM purchased is designed for small animals and there are larger models for larger animals. It doesn't make sense to me that he would buy the smaller model if its intent was specifically for cremating a human being.
LE uses the media as a way to release the info, just saying!!!
Back to the incinerator.
The model DM purchased is designed for small animals and there are larger models for larger animals. It doesn't make sense to me that he would buy the smaller model if its intent was specifically for cremating a human being.
Veterinarians use deadstock incinerators to dispose of diseased animals. DM's uncle was a veterinarian. Maybe the barn was full of dead vermin, and his uncle suggested the purchase of the machine to remove the carcasses, or DM was aware of the machine because he had seen one in use at his Uncle's practice.
Im pretty sure if the incinerator was ever used to cremate a human being, this would be detectable by forensics. So if it was, we will find out. The police have said they are not sure if this machine was used in the cremation of the body or bodies at this time.
I am very familiar with how the system works. And I am also aware that the Crown's responsibility is to present the facts and evidence as gathered by the various LE agencies involved. They are held to a very high standard of proof and their "job" is to obtain justice, not to twist facts just to get a conviction. Assistant Crown Attorneys are hired by the Crown Attorney for a particular judicial district who are appointed by the Attorney Generals office. If they do not feel that LE has sufficiently proven a case against someone, they will not take the case to trial and the accused will be released. If new evidence surfaces during the course of the trial that indicates without question that LE were wrong about something and that the accused is not the correct person on trial, they will absolutely say "they were wrong", stop the trial and release the accused.
Defense attorneys however are a whole different breed. They can and do say anything they want, without the burden of proof, to try to get their client acquitted. Their very existence and livelyhood is based on the number of "wins" they obtain. The more wins, the higher the rate they can charge. Crown attorneys work off a salary and it does not change regardless of the outcome.
Perhaps if you choose to stick around and follow more cases on this board, this will become more clear to you. It's this attitude and lack of knowledge about our justice system and the Crown attorneys that represent it, that criminals and their defense attorneys count on when selecting prospective jurors. And it's that lack of trust in our very good (but not perfect) judicial system that I find very unnerving.
Well...I guess I did have words after all.
MOO
CBC News Alerts ‏@CBCAlerts 3m
Ontario police find more remains where slain man found . Not known if human; Tim #Bosma's remains found last week
https://twitter.com/CBCAlerts/status/336285601596862464
A young woman who as yet has not been found and could be alive and well ???
A young woman who has an ex boyfriend who is currently dissecting all of her private information and accessing her Facebook apparently without the young womans permission ?