Glad I was able to interject a little humour into your day.
my question remains.. does anyone see any evidence of organized crime associated with this family?
I think it may very well be the other way around. Being an ex-cop, why does GA look so scared all the time? He has done a complete turnaround since his first interviews with LE. My first impression of "dont worry, I didnt say anything" was like Dont worry, I didnt confess. We are sticking to the "plan".
I am not an ex-cop but that is my take on it also. The A's have talking in code down to a science. Ugh!
i still dont think they can change their story once in court.
im pretty sure they have to stick with what they told in the statement, or if they are going to change it they have to do so before trial, o give prosecution adequate time to research and investigate.
barring an in-case confession (which iirc means that the trial gets shut down and a new one has to start... because its a new defense) i think they have to prove their original story, or at least disprove the prosecution's hypothesis.
yes, hypothesis.
unfortunately, even though she's clearly guilty as he!!, there is no concrete evidence, its all circumstantial and character evidence.
i think we are in for a long run of hole-poking from the defense. what other choice do they have?
They don't have to talk to the State beforehand to change their story. The State is supposed to do all their investigating before trial, and the Anthony's are not in charge of how well they do their job. It would be nice if they had given the State whatever "truth" will come out at trial, but obviously the defense feels it is better served to put it into the trial instead. The Anthony's will be questioned on their statements to LE and they may change those statements on the stand but each time they veer from their statements it will be entered into the court proceedings. Also, they can say that after months of investigations, what they at first believed was obviously not the truth and that what they are saying now with more information, is the truth. Whatever the word "truth" means to them, I mean.
^My opinion also. This makes even more sense if you think about when George Anthony tried to persuade KC to put an X on Tim Miller's search map to show where the body had been discarded. Cindy refused to let KC answer.I am not an ex-cop but that is my take on it also. The A's have talking in code down to a science. Ugh!
Back then I felt Cindy was the running the show and she wanted to make sure Casey didn't tell LE anything. I felt Cindy already knew what happen to Caylee. Remember Casey got so irate when Cindy asked her if she has said anything. When the letters surfaced I did think for a vague minute if maybe that was what Cindy was referring to. Maybe Casey did tell Cindy she was molested, whether it was true or not and Cindy knew about Casey's claims. :waitasec: But why would that come up early on, that makes no sense to me. They were all still claiming the imagin-nanny took Caylee..:furious:
Back then I felt Cindy was the running the show and she wanted to make sure Casey didn't tell LE anything. I felt Cindy already knew what happen to Caylee. Remember Casey got so irate when Cindy asked her if she has said anything. When the letters surfaced I did think for a vague minute if maybe that was what Cindy was referring to. Maybe Casey did tell Cindy she was molested, whether it was true or not and Cindy knew about Casey's claims. :waitasec: But why would that come up early on, that makes no sense to me. They were all still claiming the imagin-nanny took Caylee..:furious:
In that case, one would have thought they would have said "Casey, I hope you've done the right thing and told LE you killed Caylee. We're here for you and we want you to know we'll always love you. We're so sorry that we've all gotten to this place. We'll all get through it together."
But she didn't. She threw it at Casey just as soon as she found out that Casey had talked to the psychiatrist. "We forgive you for whatever you said" is not the same as what I put in the first paragraph. In fact, there should be no need for forgiveness for what one told a psychiatrist. There should be relief that Casey was able to find an outlet. Yet then Casey assures them she not only did not "let out" but that she would be holding her tongue for all time because they just "misconschtrue" whatever she says anyway. "We forgive you for whatever you said" in this situation becomes Cindy's protection for the future. In essence, she is denying the truthfulness of whatever was said before knowing what Casey said.And I still want to know why. Why did she look for reassurance that Casey had not told someone something. Why did she believe Casey when Casey said so quickly "I haven't said anything, don't worry." Knowing how these two women operate, so much was said in this short two sentence exchange, I'm amazed one or both of them didn't walk away needing a change of underpants. I believe Casey DID say something to someone, and I believe Cindy wants to know exactly what that is so she can CHOA.