Clock's Tickin
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2008
- Messages
- 594
- Reaction score
- 0
I believe the opposite! I think CA has the line of need and reflects it to GA to "throw the dogs off the scent". IMO GA's behaviors are that of a person who has lived, and learned to cope, with people who are impaired for a long long time. The genetic predisposition for a lot of these disorders are hereditary, but on top of that a child is then raised by the person who carried that genetic marker. I am by no means excusing KC's behavior, millions of people live with these disorders and commit no crimes, but when you look at how these circumstances fell together the family dynamic definitely comes into play. A person with KC's obvious (and yes-they are obvious not only to experts who have gone on record in this case, but also to anyone who has had encounters with people like KC) psychiatric condition will most likely never be able to help put this case to rest without years of therapy. Does she deserve the worst punishment the court can hand down?-of course she does. Is she responsible for her actions? Of course she is. And Yes, the tragedy would have certainly been averted if the child did not live in this household. That said, this was not the case for Caylee and tragedy can happen anywhere, at any time, to anyone.