Woe.be.gone
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2008
- Messages
- 13,022
- Reaction score
- 225
I'm noting here that CA first reported the date of June 7, as the date she last saw Caylee during the 3rd 911 call.
She stated, with assurance, that she had not seen Caylee since June 7.
I never realized the date had been tossed out during the 911 call.
I thought it was determined later when the police were at the house.
CA seemed to know the exact date she last saw Caylee (but later enter the pics dated July 15).
During the same call KC stated, "I have not seen my daughter in 31 days." Her statement would conclude a different date.
Nobody bothered to question the conflict in dates prior to putting out flyers, etc.
We know KC has lied about just about everything but, if the pictures were proven to of been taken on the 15th,
then KC is telling the truth regarding the last date for Caylee.
Why would CA not know the date she last saw Caylee? I cannot reconcile this in my brain.
She had, like she said, a month to think about it. She tells KC that she's given her a month but states a date that goes back five weeks. Why?
Why wouldn't she just state "I'll have to check the date, but its been about one month since I last saw my granddaughter."
Why be specific about a date that turns out to be wrong?
CA's error makes me think she had a purpose in stating the wrong date.
I cannot accept it was a simple mistake considering all the drammmma that had been going on between KC and CA.
Thank you CA for bringing this to my attention once again.
She stated, with assurance, that she had not seen Caylee since June 7.
I never realized the date had been tossed out during the 911 call.
I thought it was determined later when the police were at the house.
CA seemed to know the exact date she last saw Caylee (but later enter the pics dated July 15).
During the same call KC stated, "I have not seen my daughter in 31 days." Her statement would conclude a different date.
Nobody bothered to question the conflict in dates prior to putting out flyers, etc.
We know KC has lied about just about everything but, if the pictures were proven to of been taken on the 15th,
then KC is telling the truth regarding the last date for Caylee.
Why would CA not know the date she last saw Caylee? I cannot reconcile this in my brain.
She had, like she said, a month to think about it. She tells KC that she's given her a month but states a date that goes back five weeks. Why?
Why wouldn't she just state "I'll have to check the date, but its been about one month since I last saw my granddaughter."
Why be specific about a date that turns out to be wrong?
CA's error makes me think she had a purpose in stating the wrong date.
I cannot accept it was a simple mistake considering all the drammmma that had been going on between KC and CA.
Thank you CA for bringing this to my attention once again.