SuziQ
Former Member
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2007
- Messages
- 39,600
- Reaction score
- 52,014
it's a 3 not 8
Unless the SA can show a reason for the 03, such as recent purchase for the book, that kinda solves that.
it's a 3 not 8
It appears to me that some of the pages prior to the one we are seeing have been torn out, my girls would do this with their journals too. They were not that sentimental about keeping them or dedicated about writing in them and this may be the case with KC and the reason for the "03" date. Just recycling an old journal. JMO.
imo~ it seems pages are torn out...i have done this numerous times...i am a great journal starter...but bad finisher...i can see her starting all over again...
When would the body have been dumped in the timeline...def. Before the 21st right.
As a mom of teens it doesn't really sound like a 16-17 yo...
Oh God....before I say anything else...I want to send a prayer out to the Anthony's today. If they don't already know about it, this recent info has got to be very very disturbing for them. So, my prayers are with them.
I have tried to remain objective in this case. Despite all the info released, I still had hope that Casey was innocent. Logically, the evidence was strong...but emotionally, I just wasn't ready to accept that she had done something horrible to her child. I didn't want to be too quick to judge. I wanted more evidence...and now that I've got it...my heart hurts...deeply, very deeply hurts. I was holding onto that 1% chance she was innocent...and after reading some of the new info, and seeing the crime scene photos...that 1% chance is gone....my hope is gone. I feel a hole in my heart, an emptiness in my stomach...I can't even imagine how the Anthony's feel.
Sorry for being so mushy and emotional....I had to get it out and I can't start sobbing at my desk.
It appears to me that some of the pages prior to the one we are seeing have been torn out, my girls would do this with their journals too. They were not that sentimental about keeping them or dedicated about writing in them and this may be the case with KC and the reason for the "03" date. Just recycling an old journal. JMO.
FYI - the date of Saturday that is given does NOT match with the date for December 30th for either the year 2003, when December 30 was a Tuesday, or for the year 2008, when December 30 was also a Tuesday. :waitasec:
I thought that it looked like pages were removed also....
To me, it is like she was writing in that diary, and did not make many entries. Then, ripped out all of the past entries- and started anew on the June date. she just took out ANYTHING that was CAYLEE. I bet if garbage pickers had gotten to their garbage sooner, we'd have seen those entries. Just like the page of firsts she chucked....
JMO
She has no regrets
She made the right decision
She just hopes that the end justifies the means
I don't think the date in question is the date of the diary at all. I think it's the date it was found or logged into evidence. Was there a search done on Dec. 20th or right around Dec. 20th?
I think the date is "Saturday 12-20-2008" and I don't think it's the diary date, I think it's the date the diary was logged into evidence. I just checked the 2008 calendar and 12-20-2008 was a Saturday. I think a heavy marked was used and the number just bled making it look more like a 3 than and 8.
If this is confirmed to be 2008 entry... the DP will be coming back on the table...
If this is confirmed to be 2008 entry... the DP will be coming back on the table...
I agree. I think she tore pages out and it also looks to me that the side the year is written is the inside hard cover of the journal.
doesn't teh middle look like pages were torn out?
The fact that Caylee isn't mentioned lends credence to the entry being made before she was born.First, it looks like pages were torn out. Look down the middle of the book. I've re-used diaries, as I'm sure many of us have.
Second, There isn't ONE mention of Caylee. Not ONE word. She's TOAST!!