I have been brainstorming about this diary and wonder if it was an innocent entry why be so concerned over it that the attorney holds it? I feel there is some significance to it but I think it isn't what is on that page but maybe pages IF proven were ripped out..
I went back over the timeline to see if KC did have an opportunity to write in the diary and where she was etc..
She was at TL's appartment, there was no activity on her cell phone for a period of around 2 hours maybe more and somewhere I saw mentioned that TL saw her writing but I didn't find anything yet in interviews but still searching..It was raining that day and she didn't go anywhere that day which was a Saturday..In theory the opportunity to write is there..
I moved on to figure out how the diary would get back into the home if she had it with her..All of her things were picked up from TL's by LA the night of the 911 call..KC was not present when everything was dumped on the floor and gone thru..Nothing was looked thru by LE only by the family except for the ID from KC's wallet which was taken by LE..I have gone over statements from that time frame but nothing is mentioned about items except what was in her wallet, credit cards, cash, computer and the bags.
IF the diary was in there but overlooked at the time and someone went thru it later..well...I know it is a lot to SPECUALTE...but what IF they tore out the pages maybe in rage, disgust, guilt, fear, all depending on what written it in but it could also be a motive to protect KC. I also think if one person found it they wouldn't tell anyone and just destroy the pages especially if you were the one mentioned in the pages. I can picture a person blaming themselves saying 'what have I done?' and protect KC as a way of making up for the guilt..It could also explain a reason not to question KC too much because you already have an understanding and it might expose something else covered up...
I am totally brainstorming and throwing things around without valid proof but thinking of 'what ifs' and IF it is likely..It makes me think that there is something to this especially with it being in the custody of the attorney and not LE because if it was nothing it wouldn't have been mentioned at all..Any thoughts?