Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Old Lady Mason better keep the good silver locked up and sleep with one eye open with this thing living under her roof.The one thing that I loved hearing, was that Old Man Cheney was now saddled with his cray-cray client, 24/7. She is his 'housekeeper?' GMAFB
Is there a lazier, less motivated waste of space on the planet? And she is his live-in housekeeper? HAHAHAHAHAHA......:floorlaugh:
Now that is what I call KARMA. Even Baez weaseled his way out of her meaningless, worthless life. Wonder if Mrs. Cheney has filed divorce papers yet? lol
Rick- it might dispel your opinion of Casey's abuse claims if you had read the reports compiled by the defense's own Psychiatrist- Dr Danziger - which BTW Baez ditched as soon as he got them. Dr Danziger was so worried to think his assessment would be used by the Defense to further her allegations against George and Lee of abuse that he lost sleep over it- in his words he did not wish to be the 'vector' that would disseminate information like this against innocent people. He did not believe her allegations, and found NO evidence of abuse whatsoever. If all you know is what Casey says, I can understand, as she is a plausible, pathological liar.
You said you thought her reputation was that of a wonderful mother amongst her peers...As far as her friends all thinking she was a good mother- she seldom had Caylee in her care actually, so they only saw brief snapshots of her life with her. As soon as Caylee was born, she persuaded a good friend Lauren Gibbs to babysit full time for her while she 'worked' at Sports Authority. After 8 months of doing this for no pay, Lauren quit when she found out Casey never had a job, she was just out socializing all this time. Then she talked fiancé Jesse Grund's family into babysitting while she 'worked' ( again no job) she just didn't want the child with her. Then it was back to dropping her off at Cindy's office while she 'worked'- again no job. Did you read the evidence where Cindy discusses with her co workers how neglectful Casey was, how she (Cindy) was always stuck with Caylee- how she wanted to take custody of Caylee and then kick Casey out? Did you read all the evidence that showed what a neglectful, poor excuse for a mother she really was?
What good mother waits 31 days and then only under extreme pressure when Cindy notifies the Police, admits that she is 'missing'?
31 days?
Questions for the Author of Caseys Ghost
The Author makes it clear in his words that the voice recording of attorney CM is not in a Tape Form, but it is in a Digital form, Stating its a hand held device, an RCA microphone.
Is that to cover tracks? As recording one on tape has legal issues, consequences?
1)
Do digital recordings not have the same and or any legal consequences as tape recordings?
2)
Why would this author be allowed to have recordings digital or otherwise of CM talking about any details. When it was done so with the intention of writing a book together with all parties agreeing and together collaborating.
Once parties went their separate ways, one would think an Veteran Attorney with plus 40 years of experience would not forget to cover himself and his client, in case the parties for the book parted ways, and or if the book was never written or completed.
3)
If the author was contacting The Veteran Attorney with over 40 years experience with advice by way of emails during the Trial.
What would an Author be doing sending a seasoned Attorney with over 40 years under his belt experience. What advice could an author be sending the attorney? What were you advising CM during this time?
Then, right after the trial was over, the Veteran Atty Contacted the Author and said. We want you to be the author for Casey's Story,...Book.
The above is from interviews with the author, and to date I have not seen or heard anyone making any type of correction to those interviews. If one was mis quoted, you would think they would make the appropriate corrections. Also, IF there were any mis quotes or incorrect information, you would think that the author would of stated such things while online with Caylee Supporters.
" Again, I have not seen or heard of one correction being made to date."
4)
Its also been said that the author and the Veteran Atty meet and or new each other from an old case? But neither one could recall the case?
Then its said, that the author was a former Public Relations Consultant for the CM.
So how does the author and CM no each other? When and what were the circumstances of how you meet?
The Author says: He became convinced of her Guilt after 2 things.
a) The fight that aledgely occurred between Casey and Cindy on Fathers Day in 2008.
b) The search timeline of "Fool Proof" Suffocation, with became public In November of 2012.
5)
My Question is: Why did the Author not bail in November of 2012. The above is the 2 reasons he has given as to why he felt she was Guilty, and could not write the book.
6)
Why did the author wait to bail, the day before Casey filed for Bankruptcy?
7)
Why did he not bail in November?
8)
Is it true, If an author bails on the book, the day before Casey filed for bankruptcy, then the book deal was no more, and no one would have to disclose the old book agreement because it wasn't happening anymore, It was off the table by the time the bankruptcy filing took place
9)
Regarding the Authors email exchange to Title Town on January 24, 2013. Why did the author not say, I can not write this book anymore out of good conscience, as I no longer believe her story anymore, especially after the searches came out about "Fool Proof" suffocation., back in 2012.
Why say to them, I lost files, this is harder then I thought. I took on too much, and or I under estimated the work involved in this project and not asking for an advance, I really under estimated the work here with no advance.
This was the same day he said, he bailed on the project, as he has said in Interviews that He bailed on the project and didn't care about the money?
10)
The author has said: He didn't want to be associated with the most hated woman in America. It occurred to him on January 34, 2013. The day before Casey filed for Bankruptcy, that if he continued the book, he would be associated with the most hated woman in America. It occurred to him, almost 2 years after the Trail was over.
Is that the real reason? The Author has been writing a book since after the Trial and it didn't occur to the author that she was the most hated woman in America until January 24, 2013?
11)
Also, all the talk about Casey doing work for CM, and not reporting that income to the bankruptcy court.
Isn't it highly possible that she does work for free, for room and board and that no money was exchanged.
If so, would that mean there was no fraud regarding not reporting income?
Again to date, I have not seen or heard of any changes and or corrections made with this offer with any prior interviews. No corrections were made on Caylee support pages on the Internet.
*We All want Justice for Caylee*...
I just personally do not believe the author. This is Just my personal view and opinion..
9??? good lawd! Has it really been that long?BTW- this would have been Caylee's 9th birthday..
Questions for the Author of Caseys Ghost
The Author makes it clear in his words that the voice recording of attorney CM is not in a Tape Form, but it is in a Digital form, Stating its a hand held device, an RCA microphone.
Is that to cover tracks? As recording one on tape has legal issues, consequences?
1)
Do digital recordings not have the same and or any legal consequences as tape recordings?
2)
Why would this author be allowed to have recordings digital or otherwise of CM talking about any details. When it was done so with the intention of writing a book together with all parties agreeing and together collaborating.
Once parties went their separate ways, one would think an Veteran Attorney with plus 40 years of experience would not forget to cover himself and his client, in case the parties for the book parted ways, and or if the book was never written or completed.
3)
If the author was contacting The Veteran Attorney with over 40 years experience with advice by way of emails during the Trial.
What would an Author be doing sending a seasoned Attorney with over 40 years under his belt experience. What advice could an author be sending the attorney? What were you advising CM during this time?
Then, right after the trial was over, the Veteran Atty Contacted the Author and said. We want you to be the author for Casey's Story,...Book.
The above is from interviews with the author, and to date I have not seen or heard anyone making any type of correction to those interviews. If one was mis quoted, you would think they would make the appropriate corrections. Also, IF there were any mis quotes or incorrect information, you would think that the author would of stated such things while online with Caylee Supporters.
" Again, I have not seen or heard of one correction being made to date."
4)
Its also been said that the author and the Veteran Atty meet and or new each other from an old case? But neither one could recall the case?
Then its said, that the author was a former Public Relations Consultant for the CM.
So how does the author and CM no each other? When and what were the circumstances of how you meet?
The Author says: He became convinced of her Guilt after 2 things.
a) The fight that aledgely occurred between Casey and Cindy on Fathers Day in 2008.
b) The search timeline of "Fool Proof" Suffocation, with became public In November of 2012.
5)
My Question is: Why did the Author not bail in November of 2012. The above is the 2 reasons he has given as to why he felt she was Guilty, and could not write the book.
6)
Why did the author wait to bail, the day before Casey filed for Bankruptcy?
7)
Why did he not bail in November?
8)
Is it true, If an author bails on the book, the day before Casey filed for bankruptcy, then the book deal was no more, and no one would have to disclose the old book agreement because it wasn't happening anymore, It was off the table by the time the bankruptcy filing took place
9)
Regarding the Authors email exchange to Title Town on January 24, 2013. Why did the author not say, I can not write this book anymore out of good conscience, as I no longer believe her story anymore, especially after the searches came out about "Fool Proof" suffocation., back in 2012.
Why say to them, I lost files, this is harder then I thought. I took on too much, and or I under estimated the work involved in this project and not asking for an advance, I really under estimated the work here with no advance.
This was the same day he said, he bailed on the project, as he has said in Interviews that He bailed on the project and didn't care about the money?
10)
The author has said: He didn't want to be associated with the most hated woman in America. It occurred to him on January 34, 2013. The day before Casey filed for Bankruptcy, that if he continued the book, he would be associated with the most hated woman in America. It occurred to him, almost 2 years after the Trail was over.
Is that the real reason? The Author has been writing a book since after the Trial and it didn't occur to the author that she was the most hated woman in America until January 24, 2013?
11)
Also, all the talk about Casey doing work for CM, and not reporting that income to the bankruptcy court.
Isn't it highly possible that she does work for free, for room and board and that no money was exchanged.
If so, would that mean there was no fraud regarding not reporting income?
Again to date, I have not seen or heard of any changes and or corrections made with this offer with any prior interviews. No corrections were made on Caylee support pages on the Internet.
*We All want Justice for Caylee*...
I just personally do not believe the author. This is Just my personal view and opinion..
Organized Efforts- Email Campaigns-Boycotts-Petitions:
Obviously members are free to take up any and all causes that are important to them in an effort to bring about change. But using Websleuths as a platform to promote organized efforts such as email campaigns, boycotts, letter writing, etc. are strictly forbidden without the consent of the forum owners. If you have written a letter or taken any action in support of a cause, please refrain from posting about it. Support of a particular cause must be approved by the owners prior to posting links or information regarding any such effort. Causes can be questionable in nature, even though they appear to be honorable on the surface. As it relates to using WS as a platform for promotion, the owners investigate the nature and source of such campaigns and make their own decisions as to the legitimacy of each cause. Please do not suggest, directly or indirectly, that members support any type of organized effort without getting approval from forum owners first.
Hello RN -
From Kindle pages 234 and 235.. regarding the fool-proof suffocation search made on June 16th- what proof do you have to support what you wrote below?
- Unfortunately, Tony Pipitone’s version of events is somewhat disingenuous. There was nothing “new” about the story, and prosecutors did not miss this evidence".
-The second point is that the information in question was NOT unknown to prosecutors at trial. It was left out, probably because it conflicted with their version of the prosecution’s timeline.
You did not quote CM, or insinuate that CM or someone else told you this - you wrote this yourself, so I ask - how do you know that the prosecution knew about this search at trial and left it out?