nursebeeme
Registered User
- Joined
- May 3, 2008
- Messages
- 53,158
- Reaction score
- 217
Pali,Take this for what you will...I heard someone say (a talking-head SOMEWHERE) that prelim DNA results are not admissible in court. And that they would not say she was not 'here' until the admissible results are back. Are they back? Your guess is as good as mine.
That's my 2 cents.
I did not recall that anywhere. The info provided at the bond hearing is already a part of court record...I am not sure how this evidence would work during a murder trial, etc.. but it is already entered in to the court (dogs, detective evidence, arrest warrant, etc)...
As per DNA.....if it is a hit prosecution is ALREADY (imhoo) making it work in ways unbeknownst to us (ie grand jury prep for a murder indictment).
The waiting is....:devil:......and tonite le may have stated they were still looking for an alive Caylee (who wouldn't) but their overall LE behavior does not remotely suggest that they are on the active search for a live girl... rather they are dragging their feet...treading water....acting like they are awaiting a CONFESSION to find a body or dump site evidence imhoo....and I hate to think that way....but their behavior is not indicative of a frantic search for an alive three year old child....