Caylee Anthony General Discussion Thread #149

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves

New Posts

Status
Not open for further replies.
Patty G said:
Well it looks like LE might have another computer they would like to look at. I thought all computers were taken from the house!
Click to expand...



She is probably using one in JB's office, since she is there all day long.
 
Busylady said:
Not sure if it still applies because she is no longer in custody, but this is what the records show for 7/17/08

ORDER - WHILE IN CUSTODY DEF TO BE SCREENED FOR BAKER ACT CRITERIA. NO UNSUPERVISED CONTACT WITH ANY CHILD UNDER 17 YOA
Click to expand...

Where is the link to that info please?
 
http://www.local6.com/news/17337744/detail.html

Quote: One of the notes said:

"Hey Sweetie! I can't thank you enough for everything you have done for my family. I am really looking forward to seeing you. We will schedule something very soon, I promise. I would love to have you spend the night, and spend time getting to know each other. You are such an amazing girl and already a true friend. We are so blessed to have you and your Mom in our lives. I love you. Thank you for my gift (a stuffed animal), I named him after you. I will see you soon. Love, Casey"
 
Waddles said:
well you know I'm pretty sure, and other WSs will be able to confirm this that he was never on there before!! I've been following it since the beginning of all this
And hey-he comes up as private for me-that's so weird you can see his profile! anything else interesting on there?
Click to expand...

Weird...I got to his page by going to Casey's friends page and clicking on it there. This is interesting:

May 1
Casey Anthony wrote at 1:58pm
i'm cool with that. i'd be hanging out with you anyway. might as well have some say in the music.

Casey Anthony wrote at 1:36pm
want to be my date for that party?

There are older posts from her too. I'll post them all as soon as I've copied all of them.
 
Busylady said:
Not sure if it still applies because she is no longer in custody, but this is what the records show for 7/17/08

ORDER - WHILE IN CUSTODY DEF TO BE SCREENED FOR BAKER ACT CRITERIA. NO UNSUPERVISED CONTACT WITH ANY CHILD UNDER 17 YOA
Click to expand...

Thanks. I knew I saw something somewhere regarding this. I thought it was 18, but I am glad I wasn't imagining things.
 
Patty G said:
OK ... I put "has" instead of GOT.

The person who was in the back of my grand-daughter's car GOT my grand-daughter. (Obviously he meant to say "daughter's car)


http://www.wesh.com/video/17337701/index.html

Are we any closer? All hands up for GOT!
Click to expand...
"the person who was in the back of my granddaughter's car dumped my granddaughter"

I don't know. I listened. I heard "dumped".

Thanks Patty G for the link. Again.
 
mamadofthree said:
http://www.local6.com/news/17337744/detail.html

Quote: One of the notes said:

"Hey Sweetie! I can't thank you enough for everything you have done for my family. I am really looking forward to seeing you. We will schedule something very soon, I promise. I would love to have you spend the night, and spend time getting to know each other. You are such an amazing girl and already a true friend. We are so blessed to have you and your Mom in our lives. I love you. Thank you for my gift (a stuffed animal), I named him after you. I will see you soon. Love, Casey"
Click to expand...

I think I'm going to be sick.
 
MommaShark said:
Scratch Marks???? I missed something. Fill me in please!
Click to expand...

It is in the reports released this week...the 400 pages. They describe her car as having lots of scratch marks near the trunk.....

I am so bothered by Casey violating her bail.....Does LE know this???

I want SOMEBODY to stand up and tell Casey Anthony that the rules DO apply to her!
 
Patty G said:
I was WRONG in my quote of what George said:

What he said was" The person who was in the back of my grand-daughter's car GOT my grand-daughter. (Obviously he meant to say "daughter's car)


http://www.wesh.com/video/17337701/index.html
Click to expand...

I think what he said is "The person who was in the back of my grand-daughter's car was NOT my grand-daughter". And then something about them getting their facts straight. More denial.
 
Tracy1 said:
But what difference does it make? The Judge told Casey to not have any contact with anyone under 17!!!

I dont care if somebody contacts her, she is NOT to talk to them...and certainly not invite them to spend the night!

And not convince them that Caylee is alive!
Click to expand...
Do you know that the judge said that? If so, please point to it. Last I saw was that post that said she was being "evaluated" for that. If she is not supposed to have contact with minors -- this is a violation.
 
shadow of my mind said:
So GA is saying that yes there was decomp in the trunk, but it was not Caylee.
So if it was not Caylee then who was it? How did this person get in the trunk of Casey's car and how did this person get dead in the first place to end up in Casey's trunk
and is does this dead person have anything to do with whomever has or took or is hiding or whatever Caylee.
It still goes back to the time between when GA saw the gas cans in the trunk and the car being noticed at the strip mall.
Click to expand...


Cindy already conveniently offered us the answer for that one...some meanie put a dead body in the car while it was at the tow yard. Poor Casey, she sure has some bad luck. IMOO
 
mamadofthree said:
http://www.local6.com/news/17337744/detail.html

You are such an amazing girl and already a true friend. We are so blessed to have you and your Mom in our lives. I love you. Thank you for my gift (a stuffed animal), I named him after you. I will see you soon. Love, Casey"[/B]
Click to expand...


I love you? I hope the 12 year old girl's parents put an end to her communication with Casey. Obviously Casey is writing to her to further her own story of being the caring Mother of the Year.
 
I'm pretty certain I heard "The person in the trunk of my grandaughter's car is NOT my grandaughter"

how are you guys hearing differently?
 
puffster said:
Do you know that the judge said that? If so, please point to it. Last I saw was that post that said she was being "evaluated" for that. If she is not supposed to have contact with minors -- this is a violation.
Click to expand...

I will look for it as soon as I can. Its a video of a bond hearing.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

DNASolves

Who is Fairfield County Jane Doe (1993)?

Members online

... and 129 more.
Total: 345 (members: 130, guests: 215)

Online statistics

Members online
130
Guests online
215
Total visitors
345
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
609,425
Messages
18,253,897
Members
234,649
Latest member
sharag
Back
Top