Lanie
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 16, 2007
- Messages
- 2,843
- Reaction score
- 38
To the press 100%
To LE I have no idea.
In their actions it would be a judgement call, I have never seen a missing persons case where an accurate and repeatable timeline from the family could not be established up to the time of the disappearance. I have never seen a case in which the little facts are waffled on and changed for really no apparent or connected reason. Other families have had a person involved or withhold information as well, and the missing persons case moved ahead both in LE and the media. Why doesn't this one?
Maybe because LE knows a lot more than we do and is trying to get all their ducks in a row?
People have made the comparison to the Trenton Duckett case, and look how that turned out. This is probably still fresh in the minds of LE, and they are maybe trying to handle things a little differently to obtain a different outcome.
Lanie