From JE's link:
Whaa...? He doesn't agree with the principle that the court should have all the relevant facts to make an informed decision? :waitasec:
Is this true?
http://media.trb.com/media/acrobat/2011-12/66627195-08151032.pdf
Talking about vendetta, he really does hate the Coxes. :twocents:
"Through this ordeal, both my sons and I are proving that there never was a problem in our home."
Um hm. A missing wife, not a problem. Family feud, not a problem. A sex offender living in the home, not a problem.
I read his declaration and viewed every single attachment he claims supports his allegations against the Coxes. Not one of his allegations is supported by the attachments. The Coxes have said nothing about the boys publicly at all. Kiirsi Hellewell states they said the boys remain in state
care, Washington state has court documents related to that decision and they look froward to more time with the boys. They didn't release that statement, Kiirsi did. But even if they asked her to, nothing stated there proves anything this guy is saying in his declaration.
Stating that the documents related to the case are being held by the state or the county is simply a deflection, because they cannot talk about facts in the case.
Everything else the Coxes have said about the boys has been in the context of court filings, which is appropriate. The Coxes cannot control what documents are published and what are not.
As to claims the Coxes were stalking him and his boys, it seems that they merely made an attempt to see the boys after being thwarted. They went to his home and rang the bell. Another person notified them when josh showed up at Lowes. That's it.
josh is crazy. All I see were efforts on the part of the Coxes to say positive things about him initially, so they could maintain contact with the boys, and then an effort to get answers and help getting back their murdered daughter's possessions.
I hope the court there in Washington can see through this charade. The only vendetta that is apparent is josh and his family's vendetta against Susan, who he murdered, and her family.
Even the DCFS letter he attached doesn't prove his allegations. It refers to comments the boys have made that could have come from anywhere, including from him.
The sooner this guy faces justice, the better for Susan's sons.
ETA: Nothing he stated in his declaration was supported by the attachments he claimed would prove those allegations. So I doubt that his belief that DCFS has found him worthy of reunification, is true. He has a way of interpreting things in a manner favorable to him, whether the truth matches his interpretation, or not.