Lanie
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 16, 2007
- Messages
- 2,843
- Reaction score
- 38
This is what crossed my mind as well.
My Theory is that ICA didn't steal all that money. That it was pretty standard that she used her Mothers account to pick up stuff, and CA knew about it. All starting like you pointed out. It's like when I kid learns to drive, you send them to the store to save yourself the trip.
Then ICA might have started freely spending and not getting CA's ok. Since she didn't work for her bill money, etc.. I can see her way over spending.
What if when CA decided to cut ICA off, she also mentioned that she would/could claim the check writing (which she ok'ed) to show ICA as a thief and use to get/keep the baby??? Wonder how ICA would respond to such a slap??
BBM
I agree with this and also Mymadori's post. (Too lazy to go back and quote it.)
If this was all done on the sly, what were Cindy and George doing for food and incidentals?
Then again, the check #'s being so out of whack is so strange. Back when I wrote checks, I usually had 2 checkbooks going at a time, because I am absentminded, but the #'s still lined up to make some kind of sense.
I'm still baffled.