Guys, I just removed 29 posts that were posted within the past 24 hours and not a single one was On Topic.
This is how and why threads get closed. :sigh:
Please keep the discussion about Cindy's BoA account.
I wonder if any of FCA's ill gotten cash from the E hollywood story will find its' way to Cindy's account?
I have to say I never realized just how much Casey stole during March 2008. Was she dragging Caylee along on all these shopping sprees? Takes a pair to keep it up for as long as she did. It obviously fed her inner demons. Without it...when she got cut off...the evil surfaced.
Didn't the article say no one from the Anthony camp was going to get paid for it? Do we believe that? I sort of do...
Since money seems to be very important to Cindy in a weird kind of way (and I say that because OCA seems to have "taken" thousands from CA's account without so much as a peep or that CA will admit to, but now is feels she is eligible to live on donations as an executive) I imagine CA feels that OCA does owe her a lot of money and I imagine she wants it back.
Sorry about the long twisted sentence...:banghead:
sorry for the blathering post above! My moldy mobile didn't let me edit! My one question here, do you think CA was ever asked about the checks OCA wrote? My bank would never let that happen. No way. I had to have a sig card and I have to set another person on my acct in person.
CA does want that money back as long as someone else is paying through a foundation set up under Caylee's name. jmo
I think if CA complained to the bank they would have wanted her to agree to testify if they filed charges against KC. I don't know how many times the bank "reimbursed" CA for checks KC wrote but they should have insisted the first time CA complained or refused to reimburse her for the stolen money. We do know KC stole from her mother's account and from her grandparents account and nothing was ever done. Then she went on to steal from Amy's account. Had the bank had her name on file would she had gotten away with as much as she did??? jmo
sorry for the blathering post above! My moldy mobile didn't let me edit! My one question here, do you think CA was ever asked about the checks OCA wrote? My bank would never let that happen. No way. I had to have a sig card and I have to set another person on my acct in person.
Did the state ever explain why they couldn't bring in the transactions and possible fake second bank account as a motive? Maybe Cindy refused to admit that she didn't create the second account if Casey was the one who did it. Maybe Cindy refused to admit just how much was stolen. Wouldn't suprise me one bit. The funds being cut off and the chloroform searches beginning a few days later is very telling. How JB can say that the girl had no parental support is amazing. She still has it with them both blaming someone else for drugging Caylee and/or helping to hide the body.
If she wanted to find her, she would have parked her car away from the house and waited at the house; KC was coming by almost daily and Cindy told Brittany who lived down the "lane" that KC was coming to the house and stealing food and money. She did not want to "rock the baby boat" so she let it go. TALK ABOUT IF ONLY I .....
In the end, the jury disliked Ashton and I bet they disliked Drane-Burdick - they ignored the almost perfect case they put on. They just did not like th eprosecution.
KC's description of the nanny was just another lie - She looked in fusion because she knew they had pictures of her in fusion. She changed her story to Blanchard Park because Melich said they found no pictures of her at Sawgrass (in reality they never checked the cameras). But KC did not know that and she fell right into their trap and changed her story.
Does CA's BOA show she received reimbursement? If so this is fraud, isn't it? Would be a great scam if you could get away with it. Your daughter goes in and writes checks on your acct. and then you claim the money was stolen and the bank reimburses you for the money. I doubt the bank would reimburse her without proof the person writing the checks wasn't FCA. CA wasn't going to press charges because she WOULD have to bring some action against her daughter...just guessing, I've never been in that situation before, only credit card purchases and no one ever asked me to get involved with the person who used my card. It was in another state, they bought a TV.
CA threatened to never talk to her Mom again if she pressed charges against her grandaughter...but Dear Amy...she put the brakes on real fast. I bet she was spittin nails when she thought back about FCA telling her she must have been "sleep walking" and hid her vacation stash...I wonder if Amy believed FCA..:waitasec:
I know if someone tried to put that over on me I would have started watching them..I have never sleep walked in my life so I know that would have been a lie!....Good Morning!...:seeya:
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/59182780/Discovery-Pt-1-11022010
Page 172
June 16, 2008, purchase made at Walmart for $178.48. What was the date that computer guy said he saw Casey at Walmart with Caylee? Was it the 16th or 14th?
The Target checks - the ID#s (assuming it is a FL driver's license #) written at the top of each check were all written in by Casey, imo. Every single one of them looks identical and they all match Casey's handwriting. They is no way that girl went to Target THAT many times over a 3 mo. period and got the same cashier everytime that just happens to have handwriting that looks like her own. :innocent:
This girl knew what she was doing when it comes to check fraud. She had this "work" down pat.
Link Starting at pdf pg. 148.