I think it's a little of both, Zadari. You're the mother of a beautiful child. She brings you immense joy and love. Along with that comes a lot of work. You don't resent it because she's your child. You brought her into the world and you gladly accept the responsibility. That's the way I felt as a mother, and I'm sure you do, too.
Now I'm about the same age as CA and I think about how I would feel in her shoes. I'm in excellent health, but I don't have the energy I did in my 20's and 30's. Working a full-time job and coming home everyday to care for a little one would be very hard. If my child were ill or, God forbid, died, I'd have absolutely no qualms about raising my grandchild. But if my child was running around like a little wench and leaving me to care for a toddler after working all day, I'd have a big problem with that.
I don't think for a minute that CA had anything to do with Caylee's death.
The argument is that KC's motive for killing the baby was to get rid of her so that she could be with her boyfriends and live a carefree life. KC said, in so many words, that wasn't a problem. She could've just given Caylee to her mother. CA said KC didn't have a reason to kill her because she would've gladly taken her. The point I made earlier in this thread was that they're both lying. Caylee
was a problem for KC. CA was not happy to babysit as often as she did and, in my opinion, was not willing to accept full responsibility for Caylee. The finger was pointed at KC, though, not her mother.
I hope that makes sense.