debs
Former Member
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2008
- Messages
- 7,700
- Reaction score
- 52
Quoting myself to bring this down...the motion filed today has this part of the depo quoted!
Maybe someone else saw/heard something fishy...
"It's not relevant."
Quoting myself to bring this down...the motion filed today has this part of the depo quoted!
Maybe someone else saw/heard something fishy...
:laugh:
You made me laugh.
I'm trying to find out if there's any moment in time that our cell ping police can use to pinpoint Casey at Lee's to look at/analyize Casey's pinging so it could be compared with a moment of pinging time at the Anthony home. Trying to see if any variations. See thread here: http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?p=3655217#post3655217 for discussion.
Anyone know how much $$ this could cost her?
The hourly cost of the lawyers for ZG to obtain the transcripts and videos (cost of the court reporter to transcribe (thousands), cost of the ZG's lawyers to prepare the motion to compel, cost of appearing in court, cost of taking the second deposition for all of ZG's lawyers, the court reporter and again transcribing.Oh, at least the earrings to match one of those gold necklaces I'm sure.
Please tell me the motion hearing will be televisd. I want to see Cindy when the judge order's her to answer the question. I can hear Cindy now: Your honor the question is not relevant,so I see no reason to answer the question...
[Themis flipping over the 8-ball] Very likely.I would like to know if it is likely that the Judge will decide that Cindy does have to answer these questions ? My legal knowledge is very limited.
:woohoo:OUTSTANDING!
Step 1: Deposition -- be sure to video tape it.
Step 2: MOTION TO COMPEL
Judge reviews Court Reporter's transcript
and video (if official video).
Judge issues COURT ORDER to CA to answer
Step 3: Re-do the Deposition -- be sure to video tape it.
CA again doesn't answer THE QUESTIONS
Step 4: Motion for ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR
..... <drum roll> ... (Hint: The Big "C")
CONTEMPT
Judge views CR transcript from 2nd Depo
If CA didn't answer -- Contempt of Court
Step 5: Remedy: Ranges from fines and costs to ---
Judge could order CA to ... :behindbar
How long in :behindbar -- until she answers the
questions. She "holds the keys to her cell"
:woohoo:OUTSTANDING!
Step 1: Deposition -- be sure to video tape it.
Step 2: MOTION TO COMPEL
Judge reviews Court Reporter's transcript
and video (if official video).
Judge issues COURT ORDER to CA to answer
Step 3: Re-do the Deposition -- be sure to video tape it.
CA again doesn't answer THE QUESTIONS
Step 4: Motion for ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR
..... <drum roll> ... (Hint: The Big "C")
CONTEMPT
Judge views CR transcript from 2nd Depo
If CA didn't answer -- Contempt of Court
Step 5: Remedy: Ranges from fines and costs to ---
Judge could order CA to ... :behindbar
How long in :behindbar -- until she answers the
questions. She "holds the keys to her cell"
I would like to know if it is likely that the Judge will decide that Cindy does have to answer these questions ? My legal knowledge is very limited.
Not likely to learn that, but will learn that it is going to cost a lot of money. The best part -- court ordered fines or penalties are ....................................................CA is going to have a rude awakening if she trys to bat those doe eyelashes at the judge. God forbid CA will give the judge her smirkey evil eye look. Both these A women will learn a lesson in life this year and that is, their flirty manipulative ways will not work anymore.
Well....this should be interesting. I'm foreseeing "hammertime".
OK---SO, the Judge will hear the motion on May 21---then an appointment will be made for CA to finish her depo. Got it-------Question---> will the next depo or finishing of the first, be heard before a Judge? I really wanna see how she acts before a Judge. Gosh, thats nearly a month away just to see when the depo will be. Then probably another month. Just the depos will take a year at this rate.
Not likely to learn that, but will learn that it is going to cost a lot of money. The best part -- court ordered fines or penalties are ....................................................
NOT BANKRUPTABLE! These debts could follow her the rest of her life! :woohoo: Court do use debt collectors! :woohoo:
No. Conway's assertion is not going to prevail. In the civil case, the concept of relevance is extremely broad as this is the investigation and discovery part of the case. Anything is relevant that is helpful to understand any of the allegations supporting the complaint or defenses and it is also relevant if it MIGHT lead to some relevant information; so that basically includes the world. The only things that generally don't come in are when the WITNESS can claim 5th Amendment rights against self incrimination AND statutory privileges -- attorney-client, doctor-patient etc. It was all proper questioning. CA was compelled to be there via a subpoena and she doesn't get any choice in whether or not to answer any question on any argumentative ground. Period. Further, all of her voluntary arguments and comments were just icing on the cake.Will JM and Mr. Dill's assertion that the question about credit cards is relevant to the case outweigh Conway's assertion that answering the question will impede a fair trial?
Do we know which judge they'll go before?