Luke Eliot wrote an article for The West Australian published on April 5, 2006 (page 18), titled, UK rapist still a suspect but not for Claremont
I cannot paste it but I am going to summarize and quote any relevant portions, without being biased to my own beliefs. (Italicized text indicates direct quotes.)
The article says Clare was one of eight POIs the Schramm committee looked into.
But major crime Det-Supt Jeff Byleveld said the inquiry had eliminated Paul Clare, 43, a Briton who lived in WA for 20 years.
The article says Clare is still a suspect in the 1989-1990 Kings Park rapes.
Supt Byleveld said WA Police had done extensive work regarding Clare, a sexual predator who was still being investigated.
"Weve looked at him (Clare) in relation to Macro, he has been extensively investigated and at this stage he is not a suspect in that inquiry, he said.
The article says Macro identified Clare as a POI in 1999, due to third party information and his suspected involvement in the Kings Park rapes.
------End-----
This article slightly indicates Clare could be considered again.
The other articles I've read (there were more available at one time), state, flat-out, Clare is not a POI.
I think you have misread alot of my post. I merely stated that maybe he has been ruled back in as a suspect, obviously as they look back into the case. It would be a fitting finale if the 'clare'mont serial killer turned out to be Clare, you couldnt make that up. In all honesty i dont think its him anyway, but it wouldnt surprise me if they were having an honest hard look at him based on his history.
Clare seems to meet alot of the circumstantial evidence picked up in a few articles though.
You ignored most of my main post anyway, that concerned MM who could quite possibly me a POI now we know he was inside the club (thanks to papertrail) -i'm also interested in seeing papertrails timestamp. If MM was inside the club(offering lifts etc), alone at the club too, then he brings a different angle to the investigation.
Now we know there was more MM footage kept from the public, hos face was possibly picked up if it was him putting his head out the door looking for people too, very odd behaviour, not saying it was 100% him but definitely looked similar.
MM may be a police officers son, if he is, he may have been protected, or someone knew and made him leave the state for his own good. But he could be a rapist, a stalker, a predator out at night luring girls near his car and bungling them in around his familiar night spot.
The police officer thing is not proven, but given how suspicious these crimes are and how little the rapes and assaults appear to have been inveatigated raises some alarming questions. Really. All seems a little to suspicious given how affluent the area is.
I think we will find out theres probably more to this case.
That incoherent rantist on twitter beleives the julies killer is the csk, he then mentions the csk is a former boyfriend? Is MM a former boyfriend of Julie Cutler? Who knows? I reckon will all the evidence out there on the table we would all comfortably solve this case.
All the main investigators are rotten, it was during the caporn hancock era of shenanigans.. We wont really know what happened in the crucial early years because of incompetance and negligence. The Police have ducked and dived around the coronial inquest ever since. Something smells