I'm just so impressed that the jury actually made it on time!!jurors just began at 8:31
JD Crighton (@JDCrighton) | Twitter
I'll say 10 am.So I’m taking bets on how long they go before they need a break, Anybody?
![]()
Hypothetically , jury tampering could involve a willing juror or jurors .
Not accusing or critiicizing this jury , just pointing out what the Judge & the Prosecution might be considering .
It took just hours for guilty verdict but that was a trial based on possible insanity .
Same with John Jonchuck trial .He threw his daughter off a FL bridge , pleaded insanity . Found guilty within hours & that was a complicated case.
I thought Lindsey Partin verdict could take awhile because of doubt ( the timing was so small & dad was not exactly a parent of the year) but the jury worked 12 hours straight after getting the case and found her guilty at 9:30 PM
Not really sure how the judge in this case would handle such a situation?Could the judge have polled the jurors about being approached? Or would that be improper?
Are they on break or have they reached a verdict i wonder?JD Crighton (@JDCrighton) | Twitter
Juror’s just left their deliberation room@ 9:30 am. Odd they are not taking break in hall.
Probably because the jury tampering situation needs to be dealt with .JD Crighton (@JDCrighton) | Twitter
Juror’s just left their deliberation room@ 9:30 am. Odd they are not taking break in hall.
Oh wow, LOL.BREAKING: The jury has reached a VERDICT in CA v #CharlesMerritt. However, it won't be read until Monday morning.
Law & Crime Network (@LawCrimeNetwork) | Twitter
Never have I ever !BREAKING: The jury has reached a VERDICT in CA v #CharlesMerritt. However, it won't be read until Monday morning.
Law & Crime Network (@LawCrimeNetwork) | Twitter
BREAKING: The jury has reached a VERDICT in CA v #CharlesMerritt. However, it won't be read until Monday morning.
Law & Crime Network (@LawCrimeNetwork) | Twitter