jennapuppy
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2010
- Messages
- 1,141
- Reaction score
- 154
Retribution would be more of a planned thing. You risk bringing alot of attention on yourself if your child goes missing immediately after you pick him up, immediately after you lose custody to his mother, and immediately after you have to go to court enforce getting your holiday because mom and son fight it. The potential motives work (anger over losing your rights, disappointment over putting so much money into a custody battle [extremely expensive! Especially long distance], wanting mom to know just how much pain is felt when you lose a child because she made him go through that, etc), but the timing seems less likely.
I totally agree. There are so many reasons why this doesn't make sense. Yet, that is what ER said about MR in one of her very first interviews:
Elaine Redwine told ABC News she believes her ex-husband was upset that she was the court-mandated primary custodian of their son.
"I don't think Mark treats him very well," Elaine Redwine said. "I would not put it past Mark to have done something to remove Dylan from the situation. You know, like 'if I can't have him, nobody will.'"
If you follow that line of thought, this was a premeditated act to seek retribution against her. I'm not the one who was suggesting it, she was.