Some people feel that Dylan wouldn't leave the house to go fishing or to see his friends carrying the backpack.
But if he decided to hitchinke, he would have taken it.
Some people feel that Dylan wouldn't leave the house to go fishing or to see his friends carrying the backpack.
I don't know what will happen. I'm hopeful that it will be a classy piece and not a free for all on MR. Either way this will either elevate or disintegrate Dr Phil for most of us on WS anyway , right?
Do it right Dr Phil !!!!!
I've never seen anything saying Dr Phil would not do the show without MR. Does anyone have a link?
Then I guess the billboards, fliers and all of that are just a total waste of time and effort too? Most missing persons are probably dead, so why bother huh? I get it.
But if he decided to hitchinke, he would have taken it.
What talking head gets the facts straight? What talking head is completely familiar with a case before mouthing off about it? What talking head does not relish in asking about the emotional devastation associated with the disappearance of a child?
If Dr Drew wants to make the world aware of Dylan, he should be interviewing the investigators, not the traumatized parents.
People are doubting that Dylan ever arrived at the house. People are doubting that he left voluntarily with his backpack. If the dad did something to Dylan and wanted everyone to believe that Dylan arrived safely at his house, then he should have made sure that there was some proof that Dylan arrived ... the obvious thing being that the packback should be at the house. Since it isn't at the house, it is either a very poorly thought out crime, or Dylan arrived and left, taking his backpack with him.
It's Dr. Phil, not Dr. Drew.
If MR did something, then I believe he wanted everyone to believe that Dylan just ranaway. Runaways take their backpacks with them, don't they? If he did this, he hoped LE & the world would write off Dylan as a runaway. :moo:
Why would the dad want his son to vanish from the face of the earth?
For those that feel the Dr Phil show is a waste of time do you also feel the billboards and fliers etc are a waste of time? Because really if Dylan is dead there's not much point to those either right? I guess that applies to almost all missing persons. Because lets face it...most of them are dead. Pointless really huh?
During the summer, Dylan and his friends would pile three or four to a bicycle and cruise down to the Pine River, said Wesley Herring, who has known Dylan since elementary school.
http://durangoherald.com/article/20121215/NEWS01/121219687/0/NEWS03/A-boy’s-life
There's a big difference between putting a missing child's picutre on a milk carton and asking parents that have suffered a personal tragedy how they really feel about it.
Why would the dad want his son to vanish from the face of the earth?
There's a big difference between putting a missing child's picutre on a milk carton and asking parents that have suffered a personal tragedy how they really feel about it.
And ... let's not forget that Phil McGraw has a history of editing footage for the purpose of twisting the facts (eg: Holloway case).
For those that feel the Dr Phil show is a waste of time do you also feel the billboards and fliers etc are a waste of time? Because really if Dylan is dead there's not much point to those either right? I guess that applies to almost all missing persons. Because lets face it...most of them are dead. Pointless really huh?
BBMThe funny thing is it was NOT DR PHIL who seeked out this family to exploit them and do a show on them. Many people on the FMDR page and others were contacting many different shows to try to get Dylan National exposure. People act like this is some big deal to Dr Phil and he invited them on the show for his ratings. Nonsense!
This is what I heard as this was happening. The Dr Phil show agreed to have them on after THEY were contacted. Mark didn't have time to do the show because he was too busy. The Dr Phil show only had a few slots of air time available. Mark could not do the first slot. Elaine and Cory were going to take that slot with or without Mark. Then Mark agreed to do it but not until the open slot on the 27th. Then Mark agreed to the open slot on the 20th. Then I heard it might be the 21st. Never once did I hear that Dr Phil refused to do the show without Mark!
Those that think Dr Phil's only desire for doing the show is to exploit Mark is just ridiculous IMO. WHERE IS THE LINK SAYING DR PHIL WOULD NOT DO THE SHOW WITHOUT MARK?