I know there are some posters who strongly believe that MR is guilty, but I take it as more as their primary theory, not a done deal kind of thing.
A lot of cases are completely circumstantial and we have to be prepared for this one to be the same if there is a trial. So some people will be convinced by a list of things that seem to point to MR and some won't.
If LE came out and said that there was no trace of Dylan in the house at all, not a hair, not a particle of skin, not a fingerprint, although those are circumstantial, that would be very strong, IMO, if presented with a number of other bits and pieces. But right now, I am not at the stage where MR and only MR is the key.
I still do not understand how LE can be so sure Dylan did not meet up with an accident simply because they did not find him.
But I am also one of those stuck on the phone issue. I think Dylan would have communicated with someone if his phone worked, and stayed put for his ride, if it did not. So that is my biggest problem.
(Sorry...rambling...but this case exhausts me. Seeing the photos of the dogs at work was very unsettling and added to my fears of another unsolved case.)