TxLady2
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2008
- Messages
- 8,099
- Reaction score
- 1,631
I am asking that we stop and evaluate the process as a community, to come up with a more productive approach in the search for Dylan and missing children across the country, he wrote in the statement. No child who is missing should have to wait for certain criteria to be met before the public is notified and an alert be sent out
http://durangoherald.com/article/20130517/NEWS01/130519520/-1/News01/Mark-Redwine-knocks-search
NO missing child should have to wait for their parent to PASS a polygraph!
The most productive approach is to CLear ALL family members ......then move along they cant do that can they?
I firmly believe that the most critical time was in the first day or two or three and that everything possible should have been done. I think that not enough was done in that time frame, Mark Redwine said in the interview.
BBM this is why he waited till 6pm to let someone know his son was maybe MISSING. After he took his NAP!
This sentence almost sounds like you are saying that Dylan can't or won't come home until Mark takes and passes another polygraph. I am going to make a leap here and assume this is NOT what you meant. So I'm using this as a perfect example of how words can be misconstrued to mean something different than what the original intent was. Don't be offended, because while it does sound that way, I know this is not what you were trying to get across. But when I first read the sentence, my first reaction was HUH??? Passing a polygraph is the only thing keeping them from finding Dylan??? If it is, then git 'er done!!!
No offense intended, and hoping you see my point!