CO- Dylan Redwine, 13, Vallecito, 19 November 2012 - #6

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm still not clear on that order of events. My impression is still that the dogs led searchers to the lake. After they started searching the lake, then MR brought up that he'd reported a fishing pole missing with Dylan.

I am not sure if that is correct. Because we have Dad's statement, that he didn't understand why they didn't start searching the lake sooner, because he told them from day one the pole was missing. So I think they already wondered if the boy was at a fishing spot, and that is why the dogs even went to that lake. IDK for sure though.
 
Ask her to marry you. My teenager gets the biggest kick out of that and does it often.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I asked her, she blew me off! Said, that's sweet...but we hardly know one another!
 
Me too ladies. I found myself saying it last night about my dog!! lol

Howdy to all my fellow Texans on this thread! :) y'all are so right about 'that poor child'! I probably say it every day without even realizing it. I'm near DFW as well :)
 
Wrong answer - you're supposed to say, "OMG, I was hacked!"

Dang i should be versed in the Casey speak???? Whats wrong with me? Thanks for the "Snap outta it" moment.
 
Maybe they do not find this as an issue and know that DR was there. just saying. jmo

They certainly do not seem to know for sure where he was that night once he landed. At least that is the impression I get. If they confirmed he was the house and still there in the morning, I have not seen it. Then it would be a case of his going missing on the morning of the 19th, when a lot of this seems to be about the night of the 18th. JMO
 
BTW, for anyone landing here for the first time today, nothing new.
 
They certainly do not seem to know for sure where he was that night once he landed. At least that is the impression I get. If they confirmed he was the house and still there in the morning, I have not seen it. Then it would be a case of his going missing on the morning of the 19th, when a lot of this seems to be about the night of the 18th. JMO

I agree with you.
 
Back to why we are here. Where the heck are you Dylan? Every Time i look at his face on that poster or visit his facebook page.......His Brother in the press and the Vigil really really tore me up. So very close those two. He is so missed.
 
Sleuthing the father is not allowed. The discussion rules have been relaxed but that does not mean you can outright accuse him.

No 'tunnel talk' discussion allowed.

All opinions are welcome, please don't talk about being on one team or another. We all want the same thing... Dylan to be found safe

and brought home!!!

goodnight folks. I am bumping this up in a general way and it is not directed at anyone.

Let us keep on task here.. and remember no talk of tape, tunnels, or the like. Discuss what you know. We really know little here which means frankly the conversation may be slow and sparse. Please do NOT take those moments to stir the pot or other posters. The rules for posting are as always our TOS but can be also be found in more detail at the start of this thread.
 
Everything is traceable LOL If any one of our computers were forensically searched based on what we look up. We are done LOL Yes i have looked up how to make chloroform/ chloroform/Chlorophyll/shovel/and much worse.

I did tooo....during tot mom's trial as I am sure millions of other did too. Yes pretty sure we all better hope noone ever disappears under suspicious conditions close to us....we are all done for!
 
I disagree. The first two days he ewas missing they had all hands on deck for their SEARCH for a missing child. They were coordinating search and rescue efforts in the woods and abandoned outbuildings and at the dam, where dad himself insinuated the boy might be, with his missing fishing pole. There were searchers in the woods ALL night both Monday and Tuesday, and 200 people searched the surrounding neighborhoods, and local parks.

How would it have looked to amass their forces at Dad's cabin while Dylan might be out in the woods in a ditch or stuck in a ravine? They took dad at his word that Dylan went off fishing by himself. So why would they put all of their resources into searching his property?

Besides, they DID search it the first day or so. They said they looked in all of the rooms and the basement, looking for Dylan and his cell phone. So they did do a search. And obviously they kept their eyes peeled for a crime scene or anything obvious.

But I find dad's constant criticism of LE kind of insulting, given the irresponsible parenting on his part, imo. He leaves the kid alone, NEVER checks in on him, then when he does return, he does not check into why he is not there. He assumes he somehow got a ride somewhere, with no double checking at all.
Eventually, 5 hrs later, he does go see if he is at his friends. And he has the nerve to criticize LE for not finding his own son sooner?

And I absolutely 100% agree with Mr. Redwine on this point. In fact when we found out they just searched Thursday many posters couldnt understand what took them so long especially with the CBI and FBI involved early on. It still makes no sense that they waited over a week to do this.

They should have done this immediately. In fact in cases like this where the child goes missing from any location it is searched with an obtained SW right away. We usually see LE arrive on the scene and start putting up crime tape around the property to keep the looky loos and the media off of the property and then they will wait outside until one of the lead detectives goes to a Judge to get him to sign off on the SW.

Now they waited over a week to do so. This should have been done the very day he went missing. I dont have a clue why they waited so long and it seems neither does Mr. Redwine.

I saw no anomosity that he had for LE whatsoever. He said he understands they have to look at him and his home since he was the last to see his son.



IMO

I dont know what took them so long either. I can understand as a parent why he has questions. Why not search immediately at the lake? Why not do the SW on his home and property immediately instead of a week later?

I would be asking those same questions.

IMO

obe,

so glad you are back. Not sure I did (i may have quoted to much..) this right but thought you might like to read Katydid's response to your one post. thought she had some good insight as to why a full blown search wasn't done on dad's house. I know the thread moves so quickly...and when you brought the SW up again, I remembered her response...
 
In a great number of the missing persons cases I've followed, I find that parents/friends often switch between present tense and past tense. I don't see that as an indication of guilt, although I know there are a lot of people who would disagree.

Now if a person exclusively uses the past tense when referring to a missing loved one, I just might raise an eyebrow over that.

I totally agree with you. Sometimes people naturally switch from tense to tense.

But what got me about one of dad's recent statements, was when the reporter asked him specifically to SPEAK DIRECTLY TO DYLAN. At that point I am expecting to hear something like ' I am going to find you, son, please hang on, we are all looking hard and will find you soon, stay strong..'

But he broke right into " He WAS my world, I loved him so much...' :thud:
 
Howdy to all my fellow Texans on this thread! :) y'all are so right about 'that poor child'! I probably say it every day without even realizing it. I'm near DFW as well :)

I love Big D. I just moved further East about 2 months ago. Love it here too.
 
I did tooo....during tot mom's trial as I am sure millions of other did too. Yes pretty sure we all better hope noone ever disappears under suspicious conditions close to us....we are all done for!

LOL Those where the days huh. Well i know nobody is buried under my porch. I check. Often. Kidding. I really gotta stop using that catch phrase in public tho.
 
I am not sure if that is correct. Because we have Dad's statement, that he didn't understand why they didn't start searching the lake sooner, because he told them from day one the pole was missing. So I think they already wondered if the boy was at a fishing spot, and that is why the dogs even went to that lake. IDK for sure though.

nevermind
 
I was addressing the timeline of events, so I really don't understand why you are asking me these questions.

So was I, sort of. It was just the part about him complaining about it that I was commenting on after agreeing that he said it after they went to search the lake. I guess it was more of a generic "you" than you in particular.
 
The problem with what went on from LE is that living in the area, and not even knowing about this missing child till days later, and only because of a share off facebook is really really really WRONG! They should of let the public know we had a missing child within 24 hours, instead of him being stuck on page 4 of one of the local papers! It should of been plastered on our local news and it wasn't! They were searching for a missing child, yes, but the public became more aware due to people in the community PUSHING for information, and pushing to find Dylan, not because the public was informed that we had a missing child among us. I would be way more upset with LE if it had been one of my children reguardless of the fact that yes I had to blame myself for my crappy parenting skills.

Wouldn't that also be up to the parents to get the media involved? If LE was busy doing an extensive search and rescue, then I applaud them. At that point it looked like the kid was lost in the woods.
 
Oh Oh but there is. It's now a Criminal Investigation. But we don't know why.

TY Bravo, you just gave me a thought. Funny how a little tidbit by someone else can make a little ' ping' in your mind.
It IS a criminal investigation. This is one of the very few things that LE has said about what's going on. But something is ' lacking' for a criminal investigation if they were focused on a wandering RSO type of person or a random kidnapper. At least it's my understanding something is lacking. Has the immediate area been put on 'alert' as in, watch your kids, keep your kids inside, report any suspicious persons or vehicles, we have a 'predator' on the loose type of language?
Of course they don't want to panic the public, but isn't it usually at least mentioned to be extra vigilant if they suspect someone has snatched a child off of the street or worse, from their home?

If LE has said anything like this and I missed it, please forgive .
If they have not,,,,,, does it mean anything?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
140
Guests online
296
Total visitors
436

Forum statistics

Threads
609,471
Messages
18,254,587
Members
234,660
Latest member
Dexter 7783
Back
Top