if LE believed he ran away, or hitchhiked...why wasn't any focus on the route between vallecito and bayfield? emphasis having been placed on his wanting to be with friends, so if he were to take off wouldn't that be the obvious path? south, not west:
"Specifically, investigators would like to talk to anyone who was taking photos or shooting videos that show vehicles along the typical routes
between Vallecito and Durango from 6 p.m. Nov. 18 to noon Nov. 19. That would include County Road 501 and Florida Road (County Road 240)."
http://durangoherald.com/article/20121128/NEWS01/121129612&template=mobileart
"
Another team is combing through videos and photographs taken along the road from Vallecito to Durango on the day Dylan went missing."
http://www.canoncitydailyrecord.com/ci_22110078/dad-its-wait-wonder
“We’re one way in, one way out.
Nobody is going to come to Vallecito looking for a little kid. There’s not even a playground here, there aren’t even that many kids here, and he wasn’t even living here. It doesn’t make any sense,” said Bourque, who has lived in the community for nine years.
http://durangoherald.com/article/20121127/NEWS01/121129662/0/FRONTPAGE/Search-changes-focus
as most have said before, no one has definitively come out and determined whether or not he was at the house. eileen stated that his fingerprints should be on the remote control if he was watching tv; also, on the cabinets and drawers where cereal bowls and spoons were kept...doorknobs...toilet flush handle...etc. IMO LE has to have proof at this point whether or not he was there.
LE has stated there is no evidence from the house to point them in any particular direction; and the fact that they have said, most emphatically, that he did not run away perhaps suggests that one cannot run from a location where one never was.
IMO, JMO, MOO, et cetera...thoughts?