Warwick7
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2018
- Messages
- 9,829
- Reaction score
- 108,566
I don't know the answer...MOO if she left a blood soaked scene for 4 hours is it likely she could have got it as clean as she did?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't know the answer...MOO if she left a blood soaked scene for 4 hours is it likely she could have got it as clean as she did?
I don't know the answer...MOO if she left a blood soaked scene for 4 hours is it likely she could have got it as clean as she did?
To me that makes to sense.bbm
So she could return the bed to its ~original position after she moves it to clean bloody areas.
bbmTS took photos of Gannon in bed Monday morning. Why in the world would she do that? To send to Al to show he was still asleep/sick at 8:13 and 8:17am?
Or for some other reason? To show he was alive and the room was in order and clean?
Or was he still asleep after 8am because she injured him (but not in a bloody way yet) or drugged him?
So odd to take photos of a sleeping child who is 11, imo.
Any thoughts?
jmo
Yes that's a valid reason.bbm
So she could return the bed to its ~original position after she moves it to clean bloody areas.
__and/or__
To show Gannon was 'resting from being sick'.
MOO if she left a blood soaked scene for 4 hours is it likely she could have got it as clean as she did?
Considering she first was going with a runaway scenario (before changing to the raped and abducted story), perhaps the photos were to establish he was alive and at home in the morning. idkbbm
Agreed, seems a bit creepy.
Some people take photos of sleeping babies being held by mom or grandma --but that's to show how cute the baby looks all snuggled with the parent or grand.
But an 11 year old ?
Okay this is good ^^^. Now I'm back on the fence or really leaning toward he didn't make it home.I am going to add to all these posts that I'm still on the fence about GS getting out if the truck.
I know Jessica said: "it is likely him..."
But she also said they felt animals carried him or parts of him away.
I am understanding that the AA was written before he was found. And written as "a nobody" AA.
And Michael Allen the DDA said: Finding GS absolutely changes things.
# 32 states that Jessica. "The vehicle returned at or about 2:19 and Leticia exited the vehicle. After viewing the video, I cannot be sure if another person exited the vehicle or not..."
As Gordian stated: "GS's bed being repositioned/pulled away from the wall in the picture TS took on Monday morning, when his bed was usually up against the wall, points to the attack in his bedroom occurring on Sunday night, not Monday afternoon.
If GS weren't severely injured on Sunday night, why have him stay home from school on Monday?"
By calculations from the moment she got home to the moment she unlocked the phone was 23 minutes. Extremely short period of time. And as somone just pointed out--she's already opening the back door at 2:30-- that shortens that 23 minutes by 15 minutes.
Now add TS sent several texts and even held an outgoing phone call. The times she was active on her phone: 3:41 p.m., 3:42 p.m., 3:43 p.m., 3:44 p.m., 3:45 p.m., 4:11 p.m., 4:19 p.m., 4:20 p.m. (thank you Wy for this info). And not discussing GS missing but discussing some gift for AS.
So no killing him after LH got home.
Then calculate the off the grid 2 hours.
So if his body had been found before the AA was written --- how much if it would be changed?
I tend to agree but then I remember no blood was found in AS's Frontier, the vehicle he was in Monday morning. Did she clean him up that well?Okay this is good ^^^. Now I'm back on the fence or really leaning toward he didn't make it home.
This was speculated about on social media early on. At the time, I didn’t like it.
It makes sense though.
It’s weird that Gannon’s phone didn’t respond to Al until a minute before she made a purchase. We know that her travels were unaccounted for between her first Petco visit and the second one.
So either Gannon’s phone was off and she turned it on just before reaching the checkout counter, or she left it in the store.
Either is possible though.
Maybe he sat on the board (or laid down on it in the back seat).I tend to agree but then I remember no blood was found in AS's Frontier, the vehicle he was in Monday morning. Did she clean him up that well?
I'm on the fence about whether he made it home or not.
jmo
Yes, she should charged with that too!Either way, LS had possession of Gannon's phone from at least Sunday night on which is what I've always thought. The searches, texts, etc, from that point on were all done by LS pretending to be Gannon. The lack of response to AS's text until just before making the purchase during the second Petco visit makes sense with her leaving it behind & then retrieving it or being too "busy" and having the phone off between the Petco visits.
Regardless, LS took Gannon's phone away from him & he had NO CHANCE of contacting his parents for help! I HATE her
If he wasn't in possession of his own phone (which, I agree, seems like he wasn't), I would think that shows planning and intention of harm and cover-up, not spur-of-the-moment anger.Either way, LS had possession of Gannon's phone from at least Sunday night on which is what I've always thought. The searches, texts, etc, from that point on were all done by LS pretending to be Gannon. The lack of response to AS's text until just before making the purchase during the second Petco visit makes sense with her leaving it behind & then retrieving it or being too "busy" and having the phone off between the Petco visits.
Regardless, LS took Gannon's phone away from him & he had NO CHANCE of contacting his parents for help! I HATE her
I believe she took him with her that day to run “errands” only to further her story that he ran away. I know who in my neighborhood has cameras and assume what they might capture as well as knowing what my own do. I think she assumed he would be on camera both leaving and returning but cameras are very unreliable as mine show a vehicle pull up and completely miss someone getting out (not all the time but sometimes). She then tells the neighbor she doesn’t need to see his camera because he went the other way. Interestingly enough the gate appears to be on the other side of the house likely out of view of the neighbor’s camera and we all know how much she talked about the key and the gate. Moo it was her attempt to frame her story.If Gannon did come back home with her. I wonder why she took him and what happened to him during that time. Whatever happened, started inside the house. Could she have really hurt him enough to kill him but not immediately? What kind of injury would cause death but not immediate death?
In this Arrest Doc it states G’s beloved Switch was found at the house. I wonder if they found more evidence on it in the nooks & crannies? I figured it was tossed out with the rest of the stuff.
I can't cut and paste but it is under the subtitle The investigation continues a couple paragraphs down, in reference to her google search.
Gannon Stauch: Arrest documents outline where and when missing 11-year-old boy was killed
No, and I don’t anticipate hearing about those results until the preliminary hearing.
There is no understating how big a deal having Gannon’s body is.
Great catch! Sloppily written. It does suggest LE found it in the home, which I understood all along it was missing.
Has anyone one done a timeline from the AA? I was going to start one - but just wanted to make sure I'm not repeating someone already did.
TIA!
I did one. I can post it - and perhaps you can check it over.
jmo
The fact that his body was apparently contained within a suitcase, definitely helps their cause.This IS HUGE and I'm sure LS was confident he would never be found or at best it would be so long that deterioration would leave little evidence behind! Even though I can't stand the sight of her, I would've loved to have been there to see LS when she was told Gannon was found!
Without being too grotesque, given the 1.5 months he was missing. What would we expect evidence-wise to be found? Ie. How much (if any) would've been lost to decomposition? Not much, right?
MOO