stattlich1
Former Member
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2019
- Messages
- 1,331
- Reaction score
- 17,712
bbm
1) What better option? We'd have to assume because GS entered on the rear driver side that he'd have to exit from the same door. We have no clue as to what was purchased during the day, where the items were placed, etc.
2) Re: younger sister's car seat/booster. Have you seen a photo or video evidence of a booster seat located on the rear passenger side seat? Please link it.
3) Upon returning from the 'shopping trip' we witnessed SM back the vehicle on to the driveway, drive it forward and back it up again, clearly attempting to position the vehicle to a purposeful position. It could be she was ensuring good distance between the vehicles. After all, a driver would have to enter the front driver side door if they were to use the vehicle. We also not the rear doors on the truck are not full-size doors, they are shortened doors and do not require as much clearance as a 'normal' (for lack of a better description) sized door.
4) Regarding 'timing' of shadows, the photographer in me is responding here: it is not possible for those shadows (there is more than one) to be caused by SM's exiting the vehicle from the driver's door. I take in to account sources and directions of light, juxtaposition of the two vehicles, spacing between, etc. The average person typically is not aware of those elements. Such observations and accounting is second-nature for photographers.
5) Re: "four hours", who said SM hasn't answered that? We can be certain LE interrogated SM and SM may have given a complete accounting of those four hours. If you know otherwise I'd hope you fill us in.
6) What is LE's version? Please fill us in.
Thanks!
"assume it was Gannon. (that exited the truck upon return) Then what is the next theory from there?"
I am having difficulty understanding what you are trying to show with your posts. Please feel free to elaborate your theory, I'm interested.