CO - James Holmes Trial - *Penalty Phase* #4 - LWOP

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
James Holmes sentenced to life in prison for Colorado movie theater murders

The 12-member jury reached a decision after deliberating almost seven hours since late Thursday. As they walked back into the courtroom shortly after 5 p.m. (7 p.m. ET), they made no eye contact with anyone. Some had a grim face. Some were ashen.
....

"There was one firm holdout against the death penalty and two ... who were on the fence," said the juror, who would not give her name. "I don't know if they could have been swayed or not."

She said the graphic nature of the evidence made the 15-week trial very difficult. She called it a life-changing experience.

....

As the judge read on, several people in the area where family members and survivors had been sitting heeded the judge's prior admonition and left the courtroom instead of reacting emotionally.

Ashley Moser, who is paralyzed and lost her 6-year-old daughter during the shooting, sobbed in her wheelchair and shook her head.

....

Sandy Phillips wore an emerald green pashmina shawl that belonged to her slain daughter. Phillips said that she and her husband have always said they didn't care whether the killer got life or death.

But "today what was hard for me was accepting (the sentences) for the others" who wanted to see Holmes die, she said.

"We didn't lose loved ones. Our loved ones were ripped from us. And they were slaughtered in that movie theater," she said. "But the jury chose another way and we have to accept that."

Robert Sullivan, grandfather of victim Veronica Moser Sullivan, found it hard to accept the jury's decision.

"That's not justice," he said angrily. "He's living, he's breathing. Our loved ones are gone.

More...


http://www.cnn.com/2015/08/07/us/james-holmes-movie-theater-shooting-jury/
 
DENVER - Now that a jury has sentenced to James Holmes to life imprisonment, he'll soon be transferred from the Arapahoe County Jail to the Denver Reception and Diagnostic Center.

The center, at 1900 Smith Road, is the first stop for all offenders entering the Colorado Department of Corrections. There he will receive everything from his green inmate uniform and identification card to a complete diagnostic evaluation, including medical, dental, mental health assessments, as well as academic and vocational testing and a security-level recommendation.

His assessment will determine the prison where he'll serve his life sentence.

Given his acknowledged mental illness, Holmes would be a likely candidate for the Centennial Correctional Facility, home to the prison system's main Residential Treatment Program for mentally ill offenders. It is located near Cañon City.
The Centennial facility's mental health program is part of a reform effort by DOC, which had faced sharp criticism for placing prisoners with serious mental illness in solitary confinement, also known as administrative segregation.

More at link......

http://www.thedenverchannel.com/new...tes#st_refDomain=t.co&st_refQuery=/XBpAsh8Dm3



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
The families of victims said they wanted to keep their focus and any public attention on the lives of their loved ones, and on the dozens of survivors grappling with chronic pain and coping with nightmares and grief. As for the man who did it, Ms. Phillips’s husband, Lonnie Phillips, said, “We want him to go into oblivion.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/08/u...-james-holmes-aurora-theater-gunman.html?_r=0
 
Just wanted to say a few words- please feel free to scroll and roll...

Thank you Zoey and Maise and all those that helped with the tweets and updates for all these months. There were a lot of times I missed testimony because of work and had to fill in and update with your posts. And thank you Mods, especially today when things somehow seemed to get so personal in a room I had grown to know as informational and loving during this really hard time.

I have mostly kept quiet on here, but seeing things on the thread today about "that's why we don't travel to Colorado" and "they must be high," I just felt compelled to make some sort of note. Today was really, really hard. We are a really small and tight-knit community. Denver and it's suburbs are tiny compared to other metropolitan areas. It is really difficult to find someone who was not directly impacted by this or Columbine, myself included.

People here purposefully don't talk much about these events.. because, well, we don't want to be known for these types of things, and these killers do not represent us. The jurors were picked to represent us. Hearing people from long and far bash citizens of our state, on a jury they served so professionally and dutifully, makes me feel angry and sad. I fully support our jurors, our community, and I hope you all can at least have the respect to not bash those that represented us.

Colorado hearts will forever remember and be with the 12 lost, their families, all of the survivors, the first responders and the hundreds of others hurt by this crime. But I for one, will not persecute 12 more people for carrying out their constitutional duty under the law in making their decision today.

Excellent post. It's easy for us to sit here and criticise the jury. I would not want such pressure on me. I'm just grateful they found him guilty. Can you imagine how we would all be feeling if he got NGRI? It would have been so much worse.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Hi Friends! Hope some of us will still be here from time to time until the sentencing on 8/24.
I felt so much sympathy for the victims over the non-verdict.
I had to leave the thread & internet because so many people were saying things incorrectly, that it was obvious they hadn't watched the trial or even the verdict.

Why is it that some juries have no problem agreeing to DP & others just won't agree? Thinking most recently of the American Sniper trial, he murdered 2 people & had a confirmed mental illness & hospitalizations well before the murders- yet that jury had no problem giving him a DP despite MI! That murderer had so much more proof of MI than jh did!

Goes to the same refrain, juries will always surprise us.
 
Hi Friends! Hope some of us will still be here from time to time until the sentencing on 8/24.
I felt so much sympathy for the victims over the non-verdict.
I had to leave the thread & internet because so many people were saying things incorrectly, that it was obvious they hadn't watched the trial or even the verdict.

Why is it that some juries have no problem agreeing to DP & others just won't agree? Thinking most recently of the American Sniper trial, he murdered 2 people & had a confirmed mental illness & hospitalizations well before the murders- yet that jury had no problem giving him a DP despite MI! That murderer had so much more proof of MI than jh did!

Goes to the same refrain, juries will always surprise us.

There was definitely a shift in the forum last night. I felt like closing it down on a few occasions.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
First, jurors were asked to deliberate whether Holmes was eligible for the death penalty — they found he is — then Holmes was allowed to put on a case to appeal to the the mercy of the jury.

Jurors do have to be unanimous, otherwise the default punishment is life in prison. All of them have been death qualified, meaning that when they were selected they told the court they were not against death as a punishment.

http://www.cpr.org/news/story/aurora-theater-shooting-jury-reaches-death-penalty-question-decision

It would appear that someone was not truthful. jmo
 
There was definitely a shift in the forum last night. I felt like closing it down on a few occasions.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I noticed the same the past few days....I still want to know what the Judge hands down but I cannot deal with trolls etc. we had such a nice group.

Sorry I left so fast last night.....fibro hit hard and I just went to bed until now...I will check in from time to time.

I do want to thank all those who posted the updates each trial day, those who gave their opinions, insights, comments and conversed with others in such a nice way even when they disagreed or agreed.

In the end JH will get his just due, he better be ready and should be really worried about GP...even if he is in a special holding cell for awhile, the inmates know how to get to those they want to. Killing a child and a baby....inmates are not going to be happy with him. JH will not beable to play his mind igames with people like he did before.

take care all...until later
 
Hi Friends! Hope some of us will still be here from time to time until the sentencing on 8/24.
I felt so much sympathy for the victims over the non-verdict.
I had to leave the thread & internet because so many people were saying things incorrectly, that it was obvious they hadn't watched the trial or even the verdict.

Why is it that some juries have no problem agreeing to DP & others just won't agree? Thinking most recently of the American Sniper trial, he murdered 2 people & had a confirmed mental illness & hospitalizations well before the murders- yet that jury had no problem giving him a DP despite MI! That murderer had so much more proof of MI than jh did!

Goes to the same refrain, juries will always surprise us.

Two reasons I can think of. 1. The jury in that case rejected the insanity defense of Eddie Ray Routh. He was not confirmed to have a mental illness. 2. Colorado ≠ Texas.
 
Two reasons I can think of. 1. The jury in that case rejected the insanity defense of Eddie Ray Routh. He was not confirmed to have a mental illness. 2. Colorado ≠ Texas.

Well, this jury also rejected the insanity defense! They found him guilty! They did not find him Not Guilty by reason of insanity! I don't know why you said that, you do know he was found guilty, right?
 
There was definitely a shift in the forum last night. I felt like closing it down on a few occasions.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


When I finally returned home last night, I opened this thread. There were so many pages & comments...I got a bit overwhelmed.

Maisie, thanks again for posting all those tweets, it made weeding through easier...until I fell asleep.
 
The defense got a lot of mileage from the statement of an expert who said the crime wouldn't have happened had JH not been mentally ill. What this means, I think, is that JH had the delusion that he would improve his self-worth by killing people. Had he not had this particular delusion, he wouldn't have tried to murder hundreds of innocent victims in the theater. The problem is that JH knew what he was doing was wrong. He did not act involuntarily. His illness might have kept him from seeing that his thinking was faulty; but it didn't keep him from knowing that what he was planning to do was wrong. If this is true, then I do not think his mental illness should've been used as justification for not giving him the DP. It all came down to a deliberate choice to do something heinous, the likes of which we've rarely seen. It astonishes me that a juror could sit through that trial and (twice!) view the crime scene video, yet choose LWOP instead of DP. Like someone said earlier: what do you have to do nowadays to get the DP?!
 
Unfortunately it doesn't matter if he was sentenced to death or life without parole, there are still evil, deranged people out there who will be "copycat" murderers who will and have shot and murdered innocent people in movie theaters as well as other places. Very sad.
 
I bet his parents will retire, if they haven't already, sell the SD house and move to CO to be closer to him for visits. I don't think Chris still lives at home.

Not so sure about that...they live in a very nice San Diego area and will probably come from time to time to visit him...I think they have guilt and are pleased that he is off the streets...I think the sister will go her own way and she has done for years.
 
First, jurors were asked to deliberate whether Holmes was eligible for the death penalty — they found he is — then Holmes was allowed to put on a case to appeal to the the mercy of the jury.

Jurors do have to be unanimous, otherwise the default punishment is life in prison. All of them have been death qualified, meaning that when they were selected they told the court they were not against death as a punishment.






















http://www.cpr.org/news/story/aurora-theater-shooting-jury-reaches-death-penalty-question-decision

It would appear that someone was not truthful. jmo

I read over t he jury profiles on Gold Patrol and I think the jury seemed very much as if death would have been a possibility here. I don't think at all you can say someone was not truthful...death qualified does not mean that they cannot consider other factors and decide they do not think death is right here. I don't agree but to say they are not truthful is a stretch in my opinion. I so feel for the victims but some are going after GB and the jury and making public statements to that effect and I don't think that is right...most of the families are so respectful even if they don't agree.
 
I would like to thank this site and the posters...really so nice to hear what people are thinking...main stream media is way more interested in Donald Trump these days and "if not for" this site I would be lost in this trial. Wish results were different but so it goes...I think they were serious jurors and nothing like what happened in the Arias trials. I am going to pass watching any more days of impact statements as at this point it cannot affect the outcome but understand it is for the victims. Thanks again for all the comments here....love this group.
 
Well, this jury also rejected the insanity defense! They found him guilty! They did not find him Not Guilty by reason of insanity! I don't know why you said that, you do know he was found guilty, right?

They found him guilty, and they sentenced him to life in prison. That was within their guidelines to do, and they did their job.
 
They found him guilty, and they sentenced him to life in prison. That was within their guidelines to do, and they did their job.

Did they know he plead guilty and would have taken lwop? Living in Denver I would think that was common knowledge. It was interesting yesterday to listen to GB...people should know the full story of that plea deal...GB asked for a number of documents and mental eval. etc. and the defense gave him very little and therefore he rejected the plea. He really looked so tormented during the press conf.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
84
Guests online
228
Total visitors
312

Forum statistics

Threads
609,157
Messages
18,250,217
Members
234,549
Latest member
raymehay
Back
Top