From the link:
"Materasso said there is no indication yet whether the hair are connected to the case. "We don't even know if this is dog hair yet," he said."
Read more: Police get tuft of hair from park near where Jessica Ridgeway found - The Denver Post
http://www.denverpost.com/breakingn...-tuft-hair-from-park-near-where#ixzz2A0YLXk1Y
Read The Denver Post's Terms of Use of its content:
http://www.denverpost.com/termsofuse
Please note, LE did NOT argue that this was not Jessica's hair, only that it could be from something else.
And they did not specify ANYTHING else as being in question or false, just that ""60 percent" of what Fox 31 reported Sunday night was "erroneous and bad information." Since that part of the Denverpost article was updated at 10:24:34, while the Fox information was updated at 11:05, How could LE refute what had not yet been written on FOX?