They don't deserve what, exactly? For the truth to be told? If you were murdered, wouldn't you want all people involved to get arrested?
And also, if CW is not the (sole) culprit of those three murders, there is a lesson to learn from what happened there so it can be prevented from happening again. Those two little girls deserve the truth to come out.
I totally understand that true crime cases are not like a Clue game. I saw plenty of shocking details before beginning to question the official narrative. I think that people have the right to believe in the official narrative if this is how they think that things happened. But those who don't believe in it also have the right to speak and discuss the case.
Edited to add that I appreciated your reply to my comment. It was very respectful, unlike some others.
you mention the "official narrative" several times, disdainfully, as though there is some unofficial narrative that holds precedence. The "official narrative" is based on his own words, his own confessions, proof of where he went, proof of his knowing exactly the manner of disposal of all the bodies, gruesome as his own choices were he owned up to it. And based on evidence and investigations that obviously have not been released.
The truth is that Watts has confessed to murdering his wife and 3 babies. He confessed over and over, in every venue afforded to him. He confessed in court. He confessed with further details to the FBI, etc. He wrote letters in his own hand, confessing to all the murders, and he authorized the use of those letters in 2 books. He confessed to his friends, and to his own lawyers according to him.
In all the messages he has leaked, publicly, from prison, not once has he contradicted his previous confessions. Not once has he accused anyone else of murdering his family or of taking part.
So here we are left with a situation where the murderer has confessed in the most final manner I have ever seen. This is not a case of a person being treated unfairly by LE, being misjudged by a jury, or being subjected to ineffective counsel.
He confessed to his own counsel, and declared in court that he was satisfied with the job his counsel had done, was not coerced. Watts even stated that he did not want his counsel to lie for him in a trial.
Watts' own counsel approached the DA with the guilty plea, according to Watts.
So, I would think if you want to propose that he is not the baby killer he confessed to being, that you should delineate the "unofficial" narrative that you think takes precedence over his own admissions.
I just don't get the denigration of the "official narrative" as though this "narrative" had been generated by someone other than the confessed murderer.
The Clue reference was purely my own blindspot.
