Here’s the Defense Motion for Return of Property:Thank you! I had the Amended Complaint open on my computer and didn't think about the new case number when transferred to Fremont County.
I do think it's probably about confiscated property BM wants released. I can't recall if firearms were on the inventory list previously filed by IE but BM will no longer be deemed a felon on the date of the hearing so maybe he wants any guns available. JMO
Suzanne would like her money back.
Oh, wait.
BM seems to have barried the truth and bulldozed justice.
Jmo
And who else had the need and the skillset to disappear her completely?It's just crap isn't it?
Most of us here, feel like we know he murdered her. Stole everything from her. Yet, he's walking free. Where's the justice? Why is this happening? The AA showed motive and opportunity, placed him there when ALL communication went dark, not just by phone data but also by his own stupid and crazy admission of shooting chipmunks! Bloody chipmunks - I mean, seriously!! And ppl believe and defend this man? Drives me crazy.
Jmo
Thanks. Yup, there's indeed a number of weapons on the list.Here’s the Defense Motion for Return of Property:
Here‘s the Prosecution’s Response:
Source:
![]()
Barry Morphew’s request to have seized property returned was denied, search for Suzanne Morphew continues in Colorado
A Colorado man who was once facing murder charges tied to the disappearance of his wife is now looking to reclaim property that was seized by authorities.www.kktv.com
@Megnut I think you were the one who once wrote something to the effect that BM "carried" his bulldozer around like it was his purse. His affinity for the bulldozer being so symbolic. You constantly allude to it - he "barry's" with it and bulldozes anything in his way.Suzanne would like her money back.
Oh, wait.
BM seems to have barried the truth and bulldozed justice.
Jmo
Credit I believe goes to Lauren Scharf -- the Bobcat as his purse!@Megnut I think you were the one who once wrote something to the effect that BM "carried" his bulldozer around like it was his purse. His affinity for the bulldozer being so symbolic. You constantly allude to it - he "barry's" with it and bulldozes anything in his way.
Two of a kind, Barry and his bulldozer. Until along came Iris. And then they were three of a kind.
Barry, Iris and the Bulldozer. Creepy Crawlers. IMO
@Seattle1
@Niner
Wonder what this is about!
Wasn‘t he placed on a year’s probation for the weapon charge or something like that? Has it been a year already?
Docket Search | Colorado Judicial Branch
www.courts.state.co.us
View attachment 425935
BM has gotten away with murder for now. Lets hope that things will be uncovered (I have doubts they'll ever find Suzanne's body) to sink Barry's battleship or bulldozer I should say.Seems that when BM gets his property back (guns, etc.) then it is all over. No charges to be made. He wont be a felon. He actually got away with murder.
I would like to know what REALLY went on between the judges, Iris and LS. This was a slam dunk and people screwed up, or gave up for a reason. I would like to know.
@Seattle1
@Niner
Wonder what this is about!
Wasn‘t he placed on a year’s probation for the weapon charge or something like that? Has it been a year already?
Docket Search | Colorado Judicial Branch
www.courts.state.co.us
View attachment 425935
this bothers me..Thank you! I had the Amended Complaint open on my computer and didn't think about the new case number when transferred to Fremont County.
I do think it's probably about confiscated property BM wants released. I can't recall if firearms were on the inventory list previously filed by IE but BM will no longer be deemed a felon on the date of the hearing so maybe he wants any guns available. JMO
I wonder if that is the only motion that wasn’t concluded or had no response.
Lauren Scharf tweet
“The hearing is to address motions to limit public access to certain documents, according to the court. The motions hadn’t been discussed before the case was dismissed.”
Lauren Scharf tweet
“The hearing is to address motions to limit public access to certain documents, according to the court. The motions hadn’t been discussed before the case was dismissed.”
Replying to myself - I linked the wrong tweet - if you go to Lauren's twitter @LaurenScharfTV her tweet is under "replies" and is the first one that pops up. I hit the share button and then copied that link but I guess I am doing something wrong. Apologies
Lauren Scharf tweet
“The hearing is to address motions to limit public access to certain documents, according to the court. The motions hadn’t been discussed before the case was dismissed.”
I said this before, but I genuinely do not believe ANYONE can think Barry is innocent of murdering Suzanne based on that AA.What’s the consensus on the daughters? Do y’all think they actually believe him? Or deep down do they know but it’s “easier” (financially, emotionally, or otherwise) to publicly say they think he’s innocent?
I am not too worried he would use his guns to hurt a witness on the list. If he really wanted to he could acquire a gun now and do that. I'm more annoyed that if he got his guns back, he'd basically feel he got off with everything he's done to Suzanne, to the animals he illegally hunted, to all of it.. and that he won. got his guns back to go on hunting and killing things like before. (I am not anti hunting, I am anti Barry and his ways of hunting and feeling entitled to do as he wants)this bothers me..
there are people on witness lists that he has access to, they might be in other states because they fear him but it wouldn't be too hard to find them if he likes and he will like..IMO