Imagine being in remission ... only to lose her life to murder.That Monday after she was killed was going to be her first maintenance treatment iirc.
JMO
A life stolen selfishly away from Suzanne !!
Imagine being in remission ... only to lose her life to murder.That Monday after she was killed was going to be her first maintenance treatment iirc.
JMO
I guess I worded that poorly, sorry. I meant he would make sure the wife and children of JL would find out. Agree, that JL ruined his own marriage.Oh please! The married man who was having an affair with SM ruined his own marriage. He needed no help from BM, IMO.
I also wondered whether he would have wrapped Suzanne in that towel or something else from the Puma path home ,but think he had enough forensic knowledge to have dumped anything he took from the house in one of his dumpster runs. I would love to know what Suzanne was wearing or if he removed her clothing.Last photo. Last towel.
If that towel was in the grave....
He's not that stupid.
But he's surprised us before.
JMO
my mind wanders off in strange and awful directions, I think he sedated her with a dart, trussed her and packed her in some fashion and drove her to where he decided to bury her.Last photo. Last towel.
If that towel was in the grave....
He's not that stupid.
But he's surprised us before.
JMO
As per Ed Wallace, Jr., hair could be available for toxicology tests. If BM injected her with one of his tranquilizing darts, it may show up in hair analysis, bone marrow and even dead insects located around the body or in the grave.I’m just catching up so this may have been mentioned already but they can test hair for drugs. Hair is the last part of a body to decompose. Hopefully Suzanne’s is still viable.
My .02 is that her husband was already straying from her, and who knows how much behavior she'd already put up with, from him ?I am not quoting everyone on here about the affair and BM knowing or not knowing.
My take is I think he suspected an affair, was trying to catch her, and probably thought it was someone local at first. I don't think he knew it was JL until LE told him. He's not a cool cucumber, he's emotional, immature and a bully. He was watching Suzanne slowly remove herself from their relationship and that was driving him crazy. I believe that he's always elevated his importance in his professional life and his marriage. Her blinders were off and I do think she was done with him. Maybe he did catch her messaging but if she were able to close the app he wouldn't see those messages. We will never know all of the truth of what BM knew and what he didn't. I agree he peppers bits of reality along with his fake tales. All JMO!
<sbm>
I believe Suzanne's friend and not Barry.
Obviously, this is a matter of our personal interpretation of the various accounts. ICBW, but am interested to see if any of the other "old timers" here remember Barry crashing the Florida trip.
IMO.
Barry then referenced the second Valentine's Day in a row when Suzanne "met this guy," when she said she was meeting her dad. Barry said he told Suzanne, "Honey, (unintelligible) I'm comin' to Florida. Let's just spend a few days." He said he went and they had an "unbelievable time. We had sex three times a day. She was incredibly romantic with me. She gave me the most beautiful card that was heartfelt."
Agents talk about some things related to Suzanne's seven trips and her behavior in Mexico that likely made Barry suspicious like when he wanted to see her phone, because he was not a fool. Barry said, "I had some intuition, but I would never think it was a physical thing." ^65 Barry was told that doesn't make him guilty of her disappearance (Barry does not protest). ^65 Barry refuses to tell Agents in subsequent interviews how long he suspected Suzanne was having an affair.
SA Grusing said he did not know if Comey was a liar, and Barry interrupted, "That's ridiculous. How could you not know he's a liar from what he said on the stand? In front of the Senate?"
SA Grusing asked what he said. Barry stated, "Well, I don't know exactly what he said, word-for-word, but they asked him questions and he said, 'I don't recall.' Just like Hillary Clinton. All, all them freakin' liberals don't 'recall anything' when they don't want to tell the truth." ^60
^60 Barry's equating of people saying "I don't recall" means to him that those people are telling lies was told back to Barry on April 22, 2021, when Barry said "I don't recall" to most of the critical questions about what happened to Suzanne on Saturday and Sunday, May 9th and 10th.
The towel is probably at the resort where I'm guessing that picture was taken. I don't think it was taken in May the year she disappeared.Last photo. Last towel.
If that towel was in the grave....
He's not that stupid.
But he's surprised us before.
JMO
I'll bet that it would depend on how it was edited and where, what software was used, etc., and the new edited version could then contain identifying information about the person's device doing the edits.
I just opened a photo I took with my Nikon camera last week and looked at the various very detailed metadata, which includes my name, date and time taken, GPS location, etc. I resized that image in Photoshop Elements and resaved it under a new name using the "save as for web" feature. Closed the file and reopened it. Was surprised to see no meta data at all other than my name in the new version, and date and time saved.
EDITED TO ADD - Interesting, too, as I also did a test where I did one minor edit to a camera photo in Photoshop Elements and saved it under a new name, and this time it DID keep all of the camera metadata, so perhaps it depends on the type of edit.
Aha! The method of saving does seems to affect the metadata. If I save as a jpg, it retains the camera metadata, but if I "Save as for web" (which is another method of saving as a jpg, but provides you with a smaller, more compressed version) it strips most of the metadata out.
I also took a screenshot of the same image and looked at the metadata for that, which was pretty sparse. I saved it, closed it and reopened it, and it tells me the date and time I saved it, and that I used Photoshop Elements 2023 to save it, but nothing else.
@Skigh Yes, I see your point and tend to agree, but then again----I cannot believe that Barry would speak to anyone about what he did to Suzanne,so find it hard to think any information would have come from a prison snitch.
Sounds right.IIRC MG said that Barry was watching his trail cams while they were raking the beach at the worksite.
We know he had at least one mini cam, we just don't know where it was.
And we know Suzanne was engaging with JL throughout the morning and early afternoon, including the infamous sunbathing photo.
I suspect BA sped home because he'd seen enough.
JMO
I don't know...I got sucked in and read the entire AA yesterday. I have a strong feeling BM did not know who Suzanne was having an affair with. It almost killed him to learn another man was making his wife happy (which I LOVED haha). He asked and begged to know the name of the other man several times (even calling the other man a "boy"). His ego was so hurt because another man brought happiness and love to Suzanne's life.
The overwhelming thought I had while reading the AA was BM sounds like a child. An absolute child. He never matured past 5th grade. Suzanne deserved so much better.
Same as sayingIf I had to make a guess, I would wager something happened to her between these times mentioned on the AA:
"By 2:43 PM, Barry's phone and F-350, per telematics, appeared to be at the Morphew residence.
On May 9th,at 2:47 PM, Barry's phone appears to enter Airplane Mode."
He gets home at 2:43 PM, finds or observes something that throws him into a rage and puts his phone on Airplane mode four minutes later. Putting your phone into Airplane mode is such a...reaction. You know?
I cannot make up my mind whether digging a grave was done in a last minute panic because another plan failed or whether he thought that burying her in a shallow grave would point away from him since he did have his beloved bobcat . He must have known that a shallow grave would more than likely be disturbed by animals.
No wonder the room reeked of bleach ,those tools must have been bathed in the stuff.
@Barry oh dear you have chosen an unfortunate moniker for this thread
I’m just catching up so this may have been mentioned already but they can test hair for drugs. Hair is the last part of a body to decompose. Hopefully Suzanne’s is still viable.
tough to believe that something fast acting would show up in hair or bone- I will research... does anybody know?As per Ed Wallace, Jr., hair could be available for toxicology tests. If BM injected her with one of his tranquilizing darts, it may show up in hair analysis, bone marrow and even dead insects located around the body or in the grave.
I also wondered whether he would have wrapped Suzanne in that towel or something else from the Puma path home ,but think he had enough forensic knowledge to have dumped anything he took from the house in one of his dumpster runs. I would love to know what Suzanne was wearing or if he removed her clothing.
That plus the fact that if BM was faking her communications he surely would not have stopped doing it in the afternoon on Saturday. His alibi would be much, much stronger if Suzanne's digital footprint showed activity on Saturday evening and Sunday morning.
On May 13, 2020 he was asked to take one and refused.Did Barry ever take a polygraph?
No, it was not taken at a resort.The towel is probably at the resort where I'm guessing that picture was taken. I don't think it was taken in May the year she disappeared.