Found Deceased CO - Suzanne Morphew, 49, Chaffee Co, 10 May 2020 *Case dismissed w/o prejudice* *found in 2023* #114

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
So - no more David Fisher as reported on the 2nd quote I posted. Added Whitsen instead - correct? TIA!

I believe Fisher is from the named firm of Fisher & Byrialsen, PLLC.

But Hollis Whitsen of Samler & Whitsen, PC should be included- they are entry #8 on the docket, filed notice of appearance on May 17, 2023. Unless they filed notice to withdraw, don't remove them.

Also, the docket (MEDIA ONLY) is current as of Aug 8, 2024 and I don't plan to pull the docket for update until sometime after the 8/21 hearing. (After your vacation). :)

 
Yes, except you don't always have to pay a civil attorney ,upfront, to rep you in a big huge lawsuit. You just have to agree to handover 40 to 70% of the winnings at the verdict. If you can pay up front it is a much better deal of course.

But if not, if the attorneys feel you have a decent chance of winning big, they will do the upfront work for little or no fee, in exchange for a HUGE percentage in the end.
A contingency fee must always be reasonable in every jurisdiction in the United States. No state that I know of considers a fee of 70% reasonable. 33-45% is the average. 50% is an extremely high contingency fee; anything over would be considered unreasonable.

 
I believe Fisher is from the named firm of Fisher & Byrialsen, PLLC.

But Hollis Whitsen of Samler & Whitsen, PC should be included- they are entry #8 on the docket, filed notice of appearance on May 17, 2023. Unless they filed notice to withdraw, don't remove them.

Also, the docket (MEDIA ONLY) is current as of Aug 8, 2024 and I don't plan to pull the docket for update until sometime after the 8/21 hearing. (After your vacation). :)


Ok - left David Fisher on there.

And I shall go over to the Media thread & make sure I have those updates. And okay on updating after I get back! And THANKS! :)
 
A husband taking notes from Barry M. & legions of other murderous spouses?

Dee Warner. "Missing" Wife, 52 yo, mother of 5, since April 2021, gone from family farm in MI. after fight w spouse; her phone, purse, vehicle,& her possessions left at home; her bank a/c not accessed, no debit or credit cards used in the following months; yadda, yaddaa.
Her husband told LE she "probably went to Jamaica or Mexico."

^^^ Sound familiar?^^^ Plus other similarities. Seems many follow the tried & true spouse-killing approaches of others w the same old stories but overlook the ensuing convictions.

A break in last few days? LE removed human remains on the farm, from a sealed, empty TANK meant for anhydrous ammonia, which is used as fertilizer for crops. Possibly a page from Chris Watts body-disposal method in CO. in 2018, however the MI. remains are not yet officially, positively confirmed as Dee W.

WS thread on ^ case:

Back to Suzanne. And hopefully arrest of her killer in the near future.
 
Last edited:
I looked up the judge who is hearing the dismissal motions on the 21st, and this does not bode well for a timely decision. His name is Daniel Domenico, and he was the worst of the worst at the time of publication.


Good news -- seems there's been an improvement on the backlog since January 2024 report!

 
While I would love to see Bury charged and arrested sooner than later, I am glad they are taking their time to get it right and dot every i and cross every t.

It's good to know there is no Statute of Limitations on Murder charges in Colorado.

#JUSTICEFORSUZANNE

JMO
 
Anybody catch the new release on Netflix about of American Murder -- Laci Peterson?

I was taken back by the similarities between the Peterson and Morphew case!

For example...

Peterson was also granted a change of venue to a small, Prosecution team from San Mateo, and they were clearly no match to celebrity Defense Attorney Mark Geragos.

A Judge was replaced because the team claimed the presiding Judge was biased against them.

Like IE, defense Attorney Mark G pontificates at every possible opportunity.

At trial, defense attacked the investigators-- in an effort to discredit the circumstantial evidence.

Peterson trial also wasn't streamed/televised so trial watchers were dependent on the reporters attending the trial for details.

The first witness (lead detective) told the producers how defense attorney Mark G was actually screaming at him during cross examination to "look at me" when responding to his questions (versus facing the jurors when the witness spoke). He knew Mark was trying to rattle him but still...

As if from IE's playbook, Mark worked his way to mislead the Court and jurors on a Friday afternoon --ending the trial day with misleading information until the next Tuesday when the witness could testify and/or clarify his testimony about his police report under redirect.

Here, the lead detective used an audio recorder to take notes that he used to prepare his official, signed, police report. During discovery, Defense obtained both a transcript of the detective's audio recorder and the written report and compared the two, line by line. During cross examination, Mark accused the lead detective of intentionally failing to disclose information in his signed police report that was beneficial to his client. (A hearsay statement made in his audio was omitted from his written report).

During redirect, four days later, the lead detective clarified that his audio cited a grapevine rumor that Laci may have stopped to use the restroom of a neighbor. But on the same day of his audio record, he learned another detective actually talked to the restroom neighbor and took her statement which he included in his written police report. In other words, it was not hearsay to this detective and this restroom information was shared with the defense on the same date! No brady violation and no info ever withheld from the defense!

Detective told producers cached MSM of his testimony from that Friday continues to repeat the misinformation by Garagos to this date. Sound familiar?

Lastly, I had to laugh at one point when I realized IE and Garagos even walk alike -- they have the same gait when walking to/from the Courthouse! MOO

 
Anybody catch the new release on Netflix about of American Murder -- Laci Peterson?

I was taken back by the similarities between the Peterson and Morphew case!

For example...

Peterson was also granted a change of venue to a small, Prosecution team from San Mateo, and they were clearly no match to celebrity Defense Attorney Mark Geragos.

A Judge was replaced because the team claimed the presiding Judge was biased against them.

Like IE, defense Attorney Mark G pontificates at every possible opportunity.

At trial, defense attacked the investigators-- in an effort to discredit the circumstantial evidence.

Peterson trial also wasn't streamed/televised so trial watchers were dependent on the reporters attending the trial for details.

The first witness (lead detective) told the producers how defense attorney Mark G was actually screaming at him during cross examination to "look at me" when responding to his questions (versus facing the jurors when the witness spoke). He knew Mark was trying to rattle him but still...

As if from IE's playbook, Mark worked his way to mislead the Court and jurors on a Friday afternoon --ending the trial day with misleading information until the next Tuesday when the witness could testify and/or clarify his testimony about his police report under redirect.

Here, the lead detective used an audio recorder to take notes that he used to prepare his official, signed, police report. During discovery, Defense obtained both a transcript of the detective's audio recorder and the written report and compared the two, line by line. During cross examination, Mark accused the lead detective of intentionally failing to disclose information in his signed police report that was beneficial to his client. (A hearsay statement made in his audio was omitted from his written report).

During redirect, four days later, the lead detective clarified that his audio cited a grapevine rumor that Laci may have stopped to use the restroom of a neighbor. But on the same day of his audio record, he learned another detective actually talked to the restroom neighbor and took her statement which he included in his written police report. In other words, it was not hearsay to this detective and this restroom information was shared with the defense on the same date! No brady violation and no info ever withheld from the defense!

Detective told producers cached MSM of his testimony from that Friday continues to repeat the misinformation by Garagos to this date. Sound familiar?

Lastly, I had to laugh at one point when I realized IE and Garagos even walk alike -- they have the same gait when walking to/from the Courthouse! MOO

That sure does sound familiar.

I hope one day to see what would be the greatest similarity of all:
Barry convicted.
Sentenced to LWOP

jmo
 
Anybody catch the new release on Netflix about of American Murder -- Laci Peterson?

I was taken back by the similarities between the Peterson and Morphew case!

For example...

Peterson was also granted a change of venue to a small, Prosecution team from San Mateo, and they were clearly no match to celebrity Defense Attorney Mark Geragos.

A Judge was replaced because the team claimed the presiding Judge was biased against them.

Like IE, defense Attorney Mark G pontificates at every possible opportunity.

At trial, defense attacked the investigators-- in an effort to discredit the circumstantial evidence.

Peterson trial also wasn't streamed/televised so trial watchers were dependent on the reporters attending the trial for details.

The first witness (lead detective) told the producers how defense attorney Mark G was actually screaming at him during cross examination to "look at me" when responding to his questions (versus facing the jurors when the witness spoke). He knew Mark was trying to rattle him but still...

As if from IE's playbook, Mark worked his way to mislead the Court and jurors on a Friday afternoon --ending the trial day with misleading information until the next Tuesday when the witness could testify and/or clarify his testimony about his police report under redirect.

Here, the lead detective used an audio recorder to take notes that he used to prepare his official, signed, police report. During discovery, Defense obtained both a transcript of the detective's audio recorder and the written report and compared the two, line by line. During cross examination, Mark accused the lead detective of intentionally failing to disclose information in his signed police report that was beneficial to his client. (A hearsay statement made in his audio was omitted from his written report).

During redirect, four days later, the lead detective clarified that his audio cited a grapevine rumor that Laci may have stopped to use the restroom of a neighbor. But on the same day of his audio record, he learned another detective actually talked to the restroom neighbor and took her statement which he included in his written police report. In other words, it was not hearsay to this detective and this restroom information was shared with the defense on the same date! No brady violation and no info ever withheld from the defense!

Detective told producers cached MSM of his testimony from that Friday continues to repeat the misinformation by Garagos to this date. Sound familiar?

Lastly, I had to laugh at one point when I realized IE and Garagos even walk alike -- they have the same gait when walking to/from the Courthouse! MOO

I kept up with the trial daily on cable with Catherine Crier. I was standing in my living room when he was given the death penalty and remember cheering, all by myself. Cameras were outside the courthouse with lots of onlookers cheering. When I think of standing and cheering that someone was given the death penalty it makes me very sad. That is nothing to cheer about. But he was clearly guilty. Laci and Connor deserved to live and she loved Scott.
 
I kept up with the trial daily on cable with Catherine Crier. I was standing in my living room when he was given the death penalty and remember cheering, all by myself. Cameras were outside the courthouse with lots of onlookers cheering. When I think of standing and cheering that someone was given the death penalty it makes me very sad. That is nothing to cheer about. But he was clearly guilty. Laci and Connor deserved to live and she loved Scott.
Watching the Netflix docuseries, I was thinking how I have no memory of the punishment phase or when he was sentenced to death. I do recall when he was found guilty. Jan 17, 2006 was the last death row execution in CA. What is also sad is that Laci has been gone for almost as long as she lived. :(
 
Watching the Netflix docuseries, I was thinking how I have no memory of the punishment phase or when he was sentenced to death. I do recall when he was found guilty. Jan 17, 2006 was the last death row execution in CA. What is also sad is that Laci has been gone for almost as long as she lived. :(
What was heartbreaking for me was seeing how her mother, brother, dad and stepdad all suffered openly. They loved her so much. Yet the one who took vows to protect and love her took her life away. Sounds like Barry, doesn’t it?
 
Parallels w Laci Peterson case?
Anybody catch the new release on Netflix about of American Murder -- Laci Peterson?

I was taken back by the similarities between the Peterson and Morphew case!

For example...
....
Lastly, I had to laugh at one point when I realized IE and Garagos even walk alike -- they have the same gait when walking to/from the Courthouse! MOO
snipped for focus @Seattle1 You nailed sooo many. TYVM :) for link.

While watching Netflix episode 1 of 3, it occurred to me that both Scott Peterson & Barry Morphew initially ginned up similar sounding stories about how their wives were on innocuous sounding activities just before they "went missing."

Scott: Laci took dog for a walk in a park that morning.
Barry: Suzanne was on a bike ride.
Both came up w a classic story: vanished without a trace.

ETA: But the traces were discovered and exposed in court leading to Scott's arrest, trial, and conviction for murdering Laci & Conner.
Hoping the same for Suzanne's killer.
 
Last edited:
Anybody catch the new release on Netflix about of American Murder -- Laci Peterson?

I was taken back by the similarities between the Peterson and Morphew case!

For example...

Peterson was also granted a change of venue to a small, Prosecution team from San Mateo, and they were clearly no match to celebrity Defense Attorney Mark Geragos.

A Judge was replaced because the team claimed the presiding Judge was biased against them.

Like IE, defense Attorney Mark G pontificates at every possible opportunity.

At trial, defense attacked the investigators-- in an effort to discredit the circumstantial evidence.

Peterson trial also wasn't streamed/televised so trial watchers were dependent on the reporters attending the trial for details.

The first witness (lead detective) told the producers how defense attorney Mark G was actually screaming at him during cross examination to "look at me" when responding to his questions (versus facing the jurors when the witness spoke). He knew Mark was trying to rattle him but still...

As if from IE's playbook, Mark worked his way to mislead the Court and jurors on a Friday afternoon --ending the trial day with misleading information until the next Tuesday when the witness could testify and/or clarify his testimony about his police report under redirect.

Here, the lead detective used an audio recorder to take notes that he used to prepare his official, signed, police report. During discovery, Defense obtained both a transcript of the detective's audio recorder and the written report and compared the two, line by line. During cross examination, Mark accused the lead detective of intentionally failing to disclose information in his signed police report that was beneficial to his client. (A hearsay statement made in his audio was omitted from his written report).

During redirect, four days later, the lead detective clarified that his audio cited a grapevine rumor that Laci may have stopped to use the restroom of a neighbor. But on the same day of his audio record, he learned another detective actually talked to the restroom neighbor and took her statement which he included in his written police report. In other words, it was not hearsay to this detective and this restroom information was shared with the defense on the same date! No brady violation and no info ever withheld from the defense!

Detective told producers cached MSM of his testimony from that Friday continues to repeat the misinformation by Garagos to this date. Sound familiar?

Lastly, I had to laugh at one point when I realized IE and Garagos even walk alike -- they have the same gait when walking to/from the Courthouse! MOO


Thank you for this comparison list. It is very reassuring to read, as I didn’t remember about the change of venue and judge. I do remember Garagos and how arrogant he seemed, which was aggravating because, like BM, it was evident that SP was guilty of his wife’s disappearance and murder.

Reading your post reinforced, for me, that once a jury hears everything about BM’s murderous odyssey, he, too, will be found guilty. There’s just So Much Evidence—direct and circumstantial—that even a whirling dervish like IE will be powerless against it.
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
78
Guests online
2,433
Total visitors
2,511

Forum statistics

Threads
602,415
Messages
18,140,221
Members
231,384
Latest member
lolofeist
Back
Top