Found Deceased CO - Suzanne Morphew, 49, Chaffee Co, 10 May 2020 *Case dismissed w/o prejudice* *found in 2023* #115

[Seattle1]

It's crazy that they erode trust in institutions based on conspiracies with no basis in fact. I get mounting a robust defence of your client, but it's never allowed you to simply make stuff up. You have a duty to the court!

IME, the conduct by the defense here is far from the norm.

Here, we had a defense attorney who actually formed an organization to take down prosecutors, and arrived in Chaffee County, CO with an agenda. I can't recall a recent case where the defense Motions so blatantly misrepresented the facts.

That said, I also don't recall a case where the DA's office was such a mess, and the Judge so blinded/biased! JMO

 

[fcavanaugh]

[*]Jane says they believe the police planted evidence, including planting the BAM in her bones because two officers that they've brought charges against in the civil case were present during the autopsy.
[/LIST]

RSBMFF
Sure Jan, errr I mean, Jane.

I gotta say claiming LE officers planted BAM in Suzanne’s bones at autopsy with 4-5 other officials present at said autopsy is whole other level absurd.
On what planet does team BM/JFB think anyone will believe this outrageous hogwash?!!

Wowwwwzahhh, seems team BM/JFB has gone from desperation/grasping at straws to imo bordering on unhinged with these wild allegations based on zero evidence!

Not a good look Jane. At all.

IMHOO

#JUSTICEFORSUZANNE

ETA-clarity

 

[MassGuy]

Is Iris still listed as his attorney for the civil case? If not, how does she just bow out and another take her place?

She was in court last week, so it’s a safe bet that she is. She after money, exposure, and creating precedent.

Me thinks she’ll only wind up with the middle one.

 

[GOBliaison]

I am still trying to understand how an attorney gets away with such an outrageous allegation of corruption based on no evidence.

Uhhh...
I'm unaware of any bar to suing professionals for libels or slanders committed in the course of their calling/practice.

Iris and Jane are not ranting on the privileged floor of the U.S. Senate. [Yet.Anyway. G-G-CharleyBrown!]

Rather elementary it seems to me. Truth is the defense, and it would be the burden of Iris the Utterer to produce it... which incidentally would be totally lit !

 

[mrjitty]

Uhhh...
I'm unaware of any bar to suing professionals for libels or slanders committed in the course of their calling/practice.

Iris and Jane are not ranting on the privileged floor of the U.S. Senate. [Yet.Anyway. G-G-CharleyBrown!]

Rather elementary it seems to me. Truth is the defense, and it would be the burden of Iris the Utterer to produce it... which incidentally would be totally lit !

I wasn't meaning anyone should be sued.

What i meant is if I were a London Defence Barrister, and one day i went to the media and said the Crown Prosecutor was leading a corrupt scheme involving law enforcement, fellow lawyers and medical professionals to frame my client, and this was a conspiracy I simply invented without evidence, IMO I could expect CPS to make a complaint to the law society and to be hauled in front of the Law Society Disciplinary Tribunal.

I appreciate there is a grey area here in that the client can make such a claim, but of course the client might not be making any public statements on account of how he is huge legal jeopardy. In any case, IMO such a claim needs to be clearly denoted as the opinion of the client, and not of the lawyer.

MOO