Exactly!! This is huge. That is why I am very keen on knowing how the Judge is going to look at the Guardianship as it points towards a financial gain motive in her disappearance.
The more I read about temporary Guardianship, even in states with the most sophisticated statutes as attested by this Colorado attorney cited below, I think the monitoring system is only as good as the money state legislatures allocate to monitoring the petitioners (i.e, BM). Not only that, but it's also difficult to challenge -- hard to terminate the Guardianship!
OK, it's a fact that most people don't vanish from the earth and their partner race to court to seek Guardianship. SM is an extreme example for Guardianship but if readers learn anything from this case, it should be to take stock in your life and protect yourself against becoming a victim of guardianship abuse in general: Get a durable power of attorney and a health care advance directive. These documents can help keep the determination of your future out of a courtroom.
A lengthy article at the link but if you don't have a durable POA for yourself it's a must-read.
Guardianship In The U.S.: Protection Or Exploitation?
Catherine Seal, a Colorado attorney who has worked in law for 20 years and been involved in guardianship reform, said
state laws on the issue vary greatly. However, Seal noted,
“Even in the states with the most sophisticated statutes, you still have court hearings that happen ex parte, which means that nobody gets to be there other than the petitioner.” She said she had a recent case in which a judge signed an initial order appointing an emergency guardian without any hearing and without the required affidavits swearing to the allegations in the petition.
“I represented the respondent, and I went into court as soon as I could, and we got the thing dismissed — because the court didn’t have the necessary information,” Seal said. Her client had the means to pay for an attorney, she said. Most don’t.
[..]
“Courts are not set up well to monitor guardians,” but rather to initiate a process, get it finished and deliver a decision, Seal said.
Uekert agreed with others that an enormous part of the problem is funding.
“Everything is contingent on the courts trying to do this out of budgets that the state legislatures don’t want to support,” she said. “If the court is responsible for monitoring and doesn’t have anybody who can effectively act as a court visitor, audit cases or review accounting, to what extent can a court monitor?”
Judges and attorneys — especially those in rural counties who deal only rarely with guardianships — may be uninformed or impervious to changes in the law.
Wright said that in her early years of practicing elder law in Oregon, when she was representing someone in a contested guardianship and objected to part of the proceeding, “The judge said on the record, ‘Well, I don’t pay much attention to the rules of evidence or civil procedure in cases like this.’ So the judge has just told me outright that he doesn’t obey the law — what am I going to do now?”