Feistyomi
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2020
- Messages
- 1,034
- Reaction score
- 7,870
This speaks more to his innocenceIMOWhen a family member is missing practicalities should go out the window immediately. Can you imagine learning that your child is missing and saying, "Hmm. Okay. Now, what's the most PRACTICAL thing to do since I'm out of town? As a parent, my knowledge is extensive and would be invaluable in this situation. But I don't have that number. Sure, I could Google it in a few seconds with my phone. But it would be more practical to have my other child call the neighbor lady who would only know the bare minimum about this whole situation or where to look. Or I could call the neighbor lady, myself, and engage in several minutes of 'wait, what?!?!' with her."
To be honest, not only is it odd and irresponsible of BM, but it's not easier or more "practical" to go through the neighbor because he would have had additional steps plus he'd worry his kids.
Its MUCH more likely that he didn't want to be trapped in his car and on the phone with 911 for any part of the long drive home from Denver. We've all heard how many questions 911 operators ask, and BM would have been compelled to answer every last one or risk sounding extremely guilty. It didn't work all that well, because NOT calling is also suspicious, but it's better than a Chris Watts debacle.
We have evidence he was a partner in a happy marriage, everything else has been speculation. I have learned to streamline my communication w/ my family. I do not think he really believed anything WAS wrong, why call 911, until you have checked on Suzanne? The neighbor was a very capable lady. She didn’t need to have permission from anyone to make the 911 call, would any of us here call BM first, if we saw something disturbing?
Many of the puzzling things we have speculated on, make no sense if BM is guilty. Look at the same things from the POV that he is innocent, and many of them make perfect sense. JMHO