Auntie Cipation
Context Matters.
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2018
- Messages
- 3,576
- Reaction score
- 34,278
Thank you, Dave!The Chaffee county Fire Protection District has six fire stations, including one at Maysville. A description for each one is available by clicking on it's name at the link. Go over to the left of the page to click on Personnel to reach brief bios of the key people and information on their assignment location, The headquarters station is clearly Buena Vista. IMO
https://www.chaffeecountyfire.org/about-us/pages/stations
Levity, in my small town, people knew what you did, before you even thought about it. This will be something that will come out, if true, but IME the rumors take much longer to erase, sadly.
In my tiny town we like to joke that we don't need to use our turn signals because everyone already knows where we're going.
Those items would be visible to GPR (ground penetrating radar) as well. Would be hard to tell what the fragments are until uncovered. And would fit the "not associated with Suzanne at this time" because getting proof that fragments of the watch belonged to any particular person would take some time. It might take quite a bit of time. It's the kind of problem I'd love to see LE solve. And they can. So many clues would enable them to use fragments of a watch as evidence. Apple stores so much info about the watch itself and what it's been up to, up until its smashing.
Since in this case there's some obvious "reverse detecting" (LE knows exactly what devices the Morphews owned and what iCloud says about their various travels). So IF Suzanne had an apple watch or other smart device, that might be a piece of evidence a perp would want to destroy (whoever he or she is) and they might choose an unusual disposal method.
Would I be correct in thinking that, if it's a strategic part of their investigation, LE has the legal right to lie/give misinformation about something like whether anything useful was found during a search?
Like let's say they wanted a suspect to think they found nothing when they really did find something. Are they legally allowed to give misinformation in that situation?